Proceedings of the National Academy of SciencesNeurosciencePeer-reviewed journal article
Phantom oscillations in principal component analysis
Abstract
Principal component analysis (PCA) is a dimensionality reduction technique that is known for being simple and easy to interpret. Principal components are often interpreted as low-dimensional patterns in high-dimensional data. However, this simple interpretation of PCA relies on several unstated assumptions that are difficult to satisfy. When these assumptions are violated, non-oscillatory data may have oscillatory principal components. Here, we show that two common properties of data violate these assumptions and cause oscillatory principal components: smooth-ness, and shifts in time or space. These two properties implicate almost all neuroscience data. We show how the oscillations that they produce, which we call "phantom oscillations", impact data analysis. We also show that traditional cross-validation does not detect phantom oscillations, so we suggest procedures that do. Our findings are supported by a collection of mathematical proofs. Collectively, our work demonstrates that patterns which emerge from high-dimensional data analysis may not faithfully represent the underlying data.
- Citations
- 59
- FWCI
- 12.03
- Field percentile
- top 1%
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- The use of principal component and factor analysis to measure fundamental cognitive processes in neuropsychological data
Christoph Sperber·bioRxiv·Nov 10, 2021
- Shared Component Analysis
Alain De Cheveigné A·NeuroImagePeer-reviewed·Dec 8, 2020
- More or fewer latent variables in the high-dimensional data space? That is the question
Francesco Edoardo Vaccari, Stefano Diomedi, … Patrizia Fattori·bioRxiv·Nov 28, 2024
- A dynamic generative model can extract interpretable oscillatory components from multichannel neurophysiological recordings
Proloy Das, Mingjian He, Patrick L. Purdon·eLifePeer-reviewed·Aug 15, 2024
- Misinterpreting the horseshoe effect in neuroscience
Timothée Proix, Matthew G. Perich, Tomislav Milekovic·bioRxiv·Mar 4, 2022
- Cycle-by-cycle analysis of neural oscillations
Scott R. Cole, Bradley Voytek·Journal of NeurophysiologyPeer-reviewed·Jul 3, 2019