henhaobio
Sign in

bioRxivNeurosciencePreprint

Prior Information Shapes Perceptual Evidence Accumulation Dynamics Differentially in Psychosis

Léon FranzeniD, Sofia EickhoffiD, Christina AndreouiD, Ioannis DelisiD, Julia ErbiD, Jens KreitewolfiD, Rebekka LenceriD, Claudia Lange, Lea‐Maria SchmittiD, Hannah Schewe, Niels A KloostermaniD, Sarah TuneiD, Stefan BorgwardtiD, Jonas ObleseriD

PDFDOI

Abstract

Humans rely on prior information to navigate sensory uncertainty: Such priors could shape the decision process before sensory evidence is gathered (origin model), or could amplify sensory evidence dynamically (gain model). Dysfunctionalities in the utilisation of priors may underlie hallucinatory percepts and delusional ideation in psychosis, yet their impact on decision-making across sensory modalities has remained unclear. Using a perceptual target-detection task across auditory and visual domains in laboratory and online samples, we applied hierarchical drift diffusion modelling to examine how prior probabilities shape evidence accumulation in clinical and non-clinical populations. We show that in healthy individuals, prior information enhances sensory gain and decision flexibility, as represented by drift criterion and rate, consistent with the gain model. In contrast, individuals with psychosis exhibit diminished sensory gain, relying instead on pre-evidence biases, consistent with the origin model. Notably, greater positive symptom severity predicted a reduction in traditional criterion decision bias. These results suggest that sensory gain deficits may serve as a computational marker for psychosis progression, linking dysfunctional prior use to perceptual aberrancies. By demonstrating how prior information modulates evidence accumulation across sensory modalities, our study advances the understanding of psychotic perception and decision-making, offering insights for computational psychiatry and fine-tuned clinical diagnostics.

Citations
1

Reproducibility ledger

Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.

Sign in to file a reproducibility report.

Similarity Map
SelectedSame fieldCross-field
THISGoodwin '23Haarsma '20Tarasi '25Stuke '18Dzafic '20Murphy '24
82% semantic matchNeuroscience
Isabella Goodwin, Joshua Kugel, Robert Hester+1 more·PLoS Computational Biology·Nov 21, 2023· 21 citations