Molecular TherapyNeurosciencePeer-reviewed journal article
Enhanced restoration of visual code after targeting on bipolar cells compared to retinal ganglion cells with optogenetic therapy
Jessica RodgersiD, Steven HughesiD, Aghileh S. EbrahimiiD, Annette E. AlleniD, Riccardo StorchiiD, Moritz LindneriD, Stuart N. PeirsoniD, Tudor C. BadeaiD, Mark W. HankinsiD, Robert James LucasiD
Abstract
Optogenetic therapy is a promising vision restoration method where light sensitive opsins are introduced to the surviving inner retina following photoreceptor degeneration. The cell type targeted for opsin expression will likely influence the quality of restored vision. However, a like-for-like pre-clinical comparison of visual responses evoked following equivalent opsin expression in the two major targets, ON bipolar (ON BCs) or retinal ganglion cells (RGCs), is absent. We address this deficit by comparing stimulus-response characteristics at single unit resolution in retina and dorsal lateral geniculate nucleus (dLGN) of retinally degenerate mice genetically engineered to express the opsin ReaChR in Grm6- or Brn3c-expressing cells (ON BC vs RGCs respectively). For both targeting strategies, we find ReaChR-evoked responses have equivalent sensitivity and can encode contrast across different background irradiances. Compared to ON BCs, targeting RGCs decreased response reproducibility and resulted in more stereotyped responses with reduced diversity in response polarity, contrast sensitivity and temporal frequency tuning. Recording ReaChR-driven responses in visually intact retinas confirmed that RGC-targeted ReaChR expression disrupts visual feature selectivity of individual RGCs. Our data show that while both approaches restore visual responses with impressive fidelity, ON BC targeting produces a richer visual code better approaching that of wildtype mice.
- organism: mouse
- assay: electronic health records
- research focus: cell type annotation
- approach: statistical model
- Citations
- 10
- FWCI
- 2.99
- Field percentile
- top 8%
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Interaction between native and prosthetic visual responses in optogenetic visual restoration
Eleonora Carpentiero, Steven Hughes, … Moritz Lindner·JCI InsightPeer-reviewed·Apr 15, 2025
- Functional integrity of visual coding following advanced photoreceptor degeneration
Jessica Rodgers, Steven Hughes, … Mark W. Hankins·Current BiologyPeer-reviewed·Jan 10, 2023
- Optogenetic vision restoration with high resolution
Ulisse Ferrari, Stéphane Deny, … Olivier Marre·bioRxiv·Nov 15, 2018
- Image modifications reduce differences in natural-image encoding by retinal ganglion cells between natural and optogenetic stimulation
Varsha Ramakrishna, Tim Gollisch·bioRxiv·Jun 29, 2026
- Starburst amacrine cells amplify optogenetic visual restoration through gap junctions in the murine retina
Yusaku Katada, Hiromitsu Kunimi, … Toshihide Kurihara·Molecular Therapy — Methods & Clinical DevelopmentPeer-reviewed·May 11, 2023
- Optogenetic Targeting of AII Amacrine Cells restores Retinal Computations performed by the Inner Retina
Hanen Khabou, Elaine Orendorff, … Olivier Marre·Molecular Therapy — Methods & Clinical DevelopmentPeer-reviewed·Sep 12, 2023