Improving the sensitivity of cluster-based statistics for fMRI data
Abstract
Because of the high dimensionality of neuroimaging data, identifying a statistical test that is both valid and maximally sensitive is an important challenge. Here, we present a combination of two approaches for fMRI data analysis that together result in substantial improvements of the sensitivity of cluster-based statistics. The first approach is to create novel cluster definitions that are sensitive to physiologically plausible effect patterns. The second is to adopt a new approach to combine test statistics with different sensitivity profiles, which we call the min(p) method. These innovations are made possible by using the randomization inference framework. In this paper, we report on a set of simulations that demonstrate (1) that the proposed methods control the false-alarm rate, (2) that the sensitivity profiles of cluster-based test statistics vary depending on the cluster defining thresholds and cluster definitions, and (3) that the min(p) method for combining these test statistics results in a drastic increase of sensitivity (up to five-fold), compared to existing fMRI analysis methods. This increase in sensitivity is not at the expense of the spatial specificity of the inference.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 6
- FWCI
- 0.53
- Field percentile
- top 43%
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Including Data Analytical Stability in Cluster-basedInference
Sanne Patrick Roels, Tom Loeys, Beatrijs Moerkerke·bioRxiv·Nov 15, 2019
- Bayes Estimate of Primary Threshold in Cluster-wise fMRI Inferences
Yunjiang Ge, Stephanie Hare, … Shuo Chen·bioRxiv·Oct 3, 2020
- Cluster Failure Revisited: Impact of First Level Design and Data Quality on Cluster False Positive Rates
Anders Eklund, Hans E. Knutsson, Thomas E. Nichols·Human Brain MappingPeer-reviewed·Oct 15, 2018
- AFNI and Clustering: False Positive Rates Redux
Robert W Cox, Richard C Reynolds, Paul A Taylor·bioRxiv·Jul 26, 2016
- Reducing type II error in fMRI analysis: Cluster-extent threshold simulation results and an evaluation of current methods to correct for multiple comparisons
Scott D. Slotnick·Cognitive NeurosciencePeer-reviewed·Jan 2, 2026
- Evaluating Approaches for Inference Testing of Whole-Brain Densely Sampled Single-Subject Task fMRI Data
Michelle C. Medina, Neha Reddy, … Kevin Richard Sitek·bioRxiv·Jun 30, 2026