Brain TopographyNeurosciencePeer-reviewed journal article
Forward-projected cortical eigenmodes provide an efficient sensor-space representation of resting-state EEG
Abstract
Sensor-space EEG analyses typically rely on electrode layouts or data-driven components and rarely encode cortical geometry, making scalp patterns difficult to link to anatomy and to compare across participants. We introduce a sensor-space basis dictionary that explicitly integrates cortical geometry. Laplace-Beltrami (LB) eigenmodes are computed on a standard cortical template (fsaverage) and mapped by the lead-field matrix of a three-layer boundary-element (BEM) head model to yield cortex-anchored sensor-space harmonics. The leadfield-mapped LB dictionary spans scalp topographies, while pre-serving a meaningful spatial-frequency ordering inherited from the cortical manifold. We assess representational efficiency using ordinary least squares (OLS) projections of resting EEG (eyes-closed/open) across 59-, 32-, and 19-channel montages, and compare against spherical harmonics (SPH), principal components (PCA), and independent components (ICA). Efficiency is quantified by the variance explained R2(K) (by leading K modes) and the efficiency indices K70 and K90 (fewest modes reaching R2 [≥] 0.70 and 0.90) and reliability by ICC(3,1) of eyes-open/closed coefficients. The cortex-anchored basis shows higher early-K R2 than SPH and PCA (e.g., 59-channel eyes-closed at K=4: LB R2 {approx} 0.56 [95% CI: 0.54, 0.59] vs. SPH {approx} 0.44 [0.42, 0.46], PCA {approx} 0.08 [0.07, 0.09]) and reaches 70% and 90% variance with fewer modes (LB K70 {approx} 8.6; SPH {approx} 12.3; PCA {approx} 19.3; ICA {approx} 22.8; LB K90 {approx} 22.6; SPH {approx} 25.3; PCA {approx} 23.2; ICA {approx} 30.2). Mode-wise coefficient reliability (eyes-open vs. eyes-closed) is comparable between LB and SPH. By combining cortical eigenmodes with a forward head model, this approach yields a geometry-aligned, interpretable representation of sensor-space EEG that offers superior fidelity-complexity trade-offs at small K and a principled scaffold for low-dimensional EEG sensor space analysis.
- Citations
- 2
- FWCI
- 8.24
- Field percentile
- top 3%
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Cortex-anchored sensor-space harmonics for event-related EEG
Hyung Park·Journal of Neural EngineeringPeer-reviewed·Jun 30, 2026
- Cortical eigenmode coordinates provide compact subject-level signatures across structural MRI, resting-state fMRI, and EEG
Hyung Park, Thaddeus Tarpey·bioRxiv·May 28, 2026
- Bandwidth-aware fusion of resting-state EEG-fMRI connectivity in cortical eigenmode space
Hyung Park·bioRxiv·May 19, 2026
- Is sensor space analysis good enough? Spatial patterns as a tool for assessing spatial mixing of EEG/MEG rhythms
Natalie Schaworonkow, Vadim V. Nikulin·NeuroImagePeer-reviewed·Mar 11, 2022
- STAMP-LME: A spatiotemporal surface-mapping framework for population-level iEEG
Alejandro Omar Blenkmann, Sabine Liliana Leske, … Robert Oostenveld·bioRxiv·Oct 1, 2026
- A systematic data-driven approach to analyze sensor-level EEG connectivity: Identifying robust phase-synchronized network components using surface Laplacian with spectral-spatial PCA
Ezra E. Smith, Tarik Bel‐Bahar, Jürgen Kayser A·PsychophysiologyPeer-reviewed·Apr 27, 2022