PLoS ONEBioinformaticsPeer-reviewed journal article
Learning epistatic gene interactions from perturbation screens
Kieran ElmesiD, Fabian SchmichiD, Ewa SzczurekiD, Jeremy L. JenkinsiD, Niko BeerenwinkeliD, Alex GavryushkiniD
Abstract
AO_SCPLOWBSTRACTC_SCPLOWThe treatment of complex diseases often relies on combinatorial therapy, a strategy where drugs are used to target multiple genes simultaneously. Promising candidate genes for combinatorial perturbation often constitute epistatic genes, i.e., genes which contribute to a phenotype in a non-linear fashion. Experimental identification of the full landscape of genetic interactions by perturbing all gene combinations is prohibitive due to the exponential growth of testable hypotheses. Here we present a model for the inference of pairwise epistatic, including synthetic lethal, gene interactions from siRNA-based perturbation screens. The model exploits the combinatorial nature of siRNA-based screens resulting from the high numbers of sequence-dependent off-target effects, where each siRNA apart from its intended target knocks down hundreds of additional genes. We show that conditional and marginal epistasis can be estimated as interaction coefficients of regression models on perturbation data. We compare two methods, namely glinternet and xyz, for selecting non-zero effects in high dimensions as components of the model, and make recommendations for the appropriate use of each. For data simulated from real RNAi screening libraries, we show that glinternet successfully identifies epistatic gene pairs with high accuracy across a wide range of relevant parameters for the signal-to-noise ratio of observed phenotypes, the effect size of epistasis and the number of observations per double knockdown. xyz is also able to identify interactions from lower dimensional data sets (fewer genes), but is less accurate for many dimensions. Higher accuracy of glinternet, however, comes at the cost of longer running time compared to xyz. The general model is widely applicable and allows mining the wealth of publicly available RNAi screening data for the estimation of epistatic interactions between genes. As a proof of concept, we apply the model to search for interactions, and potential targets for treatment, among previously published sets of siRNA perturbation screens on various pathogens. The identified interactions include both known epistatic interactions as well as novel findings.
- assay: CRISPR screen
- assay: perturbation screen
- research focus: gene regulatory network inference
- research focus: benchmarking
- research focus: differential expression
- approach: statistical model
- approach: machine learning (classical)
- Citations
- 5
- FWCI
- 0.39
- Field percentile
- top 49%
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- A Fast Lasso-Based Method for Inferring Higher-Order Interactions
Kieran Elmes, Astra Heywood, … Alex Gavryushkin·PLoS Computational BiologyPeer-reviewed·Dec 29, 2022
- A Fast Lasso-based Method for Inferring Pairwise Interactions
Kieran Elmes, Astra Heywood, … Alex Gavryushkin·bioRxiv·Jan 28, 2021
- Interpretable network-guided epistasis detection
Diane Duroux, Héctor Climente-González, … Kristel Van Steen·GigaSciencePeer-reviewed·Jan 1, 2022
- Novel Methods for Epistasis Detection in Genome-Wide Association Studies
Lotfi Slim, Clément Chatelain, … Jean‐Philippe Vert·PLoS ONEPeer-reviewed·Nov 30, 2020
- A dual sgRNA library design to probe genetic modifiers using genome-wide CRISPRi screens
Alina Guna, Katharine R. Page, … R.M. Voorhees·BMC GenomicsPeer-reviewed·Oct 30, 2023
- Detection of epistatic interactions with Random Forest
Corinna Lewis Schmalohr, Jan Großbach, … Andreas Beyer·bioRxiv·Jun 21, 2018