When to learn from elders or peers: accessibility-knowledgeability trade-offs explain variation in age-biased social learning

In many animal species, individuals acquire knowledge from others that enhances their survival and reproduction. However, among the many available cultural exemplars, not all provide reliable information. Consequently, individuals tend to choose their exemplars selectively. One widespread pattern is a preference for older individuals, who may have accumulated valuable knowledge through life. Yet empirical studies also show that individuals frequently learn from age peers, suggesting that copying elders is not universally optimal. The ecological and social conditions that favor learning from elders rather than peers, therefore, remain unclear. Here, we investigate the evolutionary drivers of age-biased exemplar choice in age-structured populations where individuals accumulate knowledge over their lifespan. We develop a continuous-age model that captures the coevolution of exemplar age choice and age-specific investments in social learning, individual learning, and the use of acquired knowledge for energy extraction. We show that selection promotes a progressive shift from social to individual learning and from learning to energy extraction with age. Exemplar age choice evolves through a trade-off between knowledgeable and accessible individuals. Young learners therefore favor relatively young exemplars because they are common and still provide substantial novel knowledge, although older individuals remain more knowledgeable. As individuals age, encountering exemplars with substantially novel knowledge becomes increasingly difficult. Consequently, as they age, individuals are expected to shift toward learning from older individuals, who possess more knowledge. Population, environment, and knowledge characteristics can shift this balance, generating a wide range of strategies from learning primarily from peers to consistently targeting the oldest individuals. In particular, learning from age peers is favored by strong within-cohort interactions, high mortality, or high encounter rates. It is also favored in unstable environments with rapid knowledge loss and when knowledge is easily acquired, transmitted, and is bounded.