medRxivGenetic & Genomic MedicinePreprint
eREACH: A randomized trial of digital alternatives to genetic counseling for metastatic cancer
Kimberley T. LeeiD, Brian Lee EglestoniD, Briana I. McLeodiD, Sarah BrowniD, Sarah Howe, Dominique FetzeriD, Susan M. DomchekiD, Lauren GutsteiniD, Cara N. CacioppoiD, Dana Farengo ClarkiD, Janice Christiansen, Jessica EbrahimzadehiD, Demetrios OfidisiD, Hannah GriffiniD, Rajia MimiD, Santina Hernandez, Linda G. FleisheriD, Kelsey KarpinkiD, Enida F. SelmaniiD, Aysha TahsiniD, Evelyn Mastaglio, Lynne I. WagneriD, Michelle Weinberg, Kuang‐Yi WeniD, Elisabeth McCarty WoodiD, Angela R. BradburyiD
Abstract
With FDA approval of targeted therapies in patients with germline BRCA1/2-related advanced cancers there is a need to evaluate efficient and effective delivery models for germline cancer genetic testing. We sought to evaluate the effectiveness of replacing traditional pretest and posttest counseling with a genetic counselor (GC) with a digital intervention in patients with metastatic cancers. eREACH is a 4-arm randomized non-inferiority trial with a 2x2 design conducted from 2020-2024 and participants were followed for 6 months. Participants were recruited from the community and academic and community medical sites across the United States. A referred sample of adults with advanced or metastatic breast, prostate, ovarian or pancreatic cancer. The digital pretest intervention consists of 8 modules including purpose of genetic testing and implications of results. The digital post-test intervention consists of 4 modules including test results and explanation of results. The primary endpoint was non-inferiority in change in knowledge and anxiety from baseline to post-disclosure. Secondary analyses evaluated patient-reported outcomes (PROs) such as depression and distress, and moderators of PROs such as socioeconomic status. 229 participants were recruited from 14 states and 37% were male, 17% were non-white, 43% had less than a college education and 21% were from community sites or national recruitment. We met non-inferiority for all short-term PROs for both one visit arms (GC/Digital, Digital/GC). We met non-inferiority for all short-term PROs in the fully digital arm except knowledge which was inconclusive, although differences were small. Uptake of visit 1 was lower in the digital arms, although uptake of testing after visit 1 did not differ between arms. Patients living in poorer areas had greater reductions in anxiety in the visit 1 GC arms and rural patients had greater increase in knowledge in digital arms. Men had greater decreases in anxiety with digital disclosure, while women had greater reductions with GC disclosure. The eREACH patient-centered digital delivery intervention with one GC visit is an evidence-based alternative to two visits with a GC for patients with metastatic cancer. The fully digital model may be acceptable for some patients.
- Citations
- 3
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- A Randomized Non-Inferiority Trial of an eHealth Delivery Alternative for Cancer Genetic Testing for Hereditary Cancer (eREACH2)
Kimberley T. Lee, Brian Lee Egleston, … eREACH2 Group·Journal of Clinical OncologyPeer-reviewed·May 27, 2026
- Title: A Randomized Hybrid Type I Effectiveness-Implementation Study of an eHealth Delivery Alternative for Cancer Genetic Testing for Hereditary Cancer (eREACH2): study protocol
Evelyn Mastaglio, Brian Lee Egleston, … Angela R. Bradbury·BMC CancerPeer-reviewed·Jul 31, 2026
- BRCA-DIRECT digital pathway for diagnostic germline genetic testing within a UK breast oncology setting: a randomised, non-inferiority trial
Bethany Torr, Christopher Iain Jones, … Clare Turnbull·British Journal of CancerPeer-reviewed·Sep 30, 2024
- Genetic testing in cancer: a systematic review of patient reported measures
Kelsie Raspin, Daisy Nowakowski, … Jessica K. Roydhouse·medRxiv·Jul 7, 2025
- Validation of a guidelines-based digital tool to assess the need for germline cancer genetic testing
Callan D. Russell, Ashley Daley, … Colleen A. Caleshu·Hereditary Cancer in Clinical PracticePeer-reviewed·Nov 8, 2024
- Socioeconomic and Clinical Determinants Driving Access to BRCA Genetic Testing in Cancer : A Case-Control Study Using Observational Electronic Health Records Across Multiple Sites
Qiang Yang, Chengrong Wang, … Rui Yin·medRxiv·May 21, 2026