eLifeNeurosciencePeer-reviewed journal article
Neural precursors of deliberate and arbitrary decisions in the study of voluntary action
Uri MaoziD, Gideon YaffeiD, Christof Koch AiD, Liad MudrikiD
Abstract
The readiness potential (RP)--a key ERP correlate of upcoming action--is known to precede subjects reports of their decision to move. Some view this as evidence against a causal role for consciousness in human decision-making and thus against free-will. Yet those studies focused on arbitrary decisions--purposeless, unreasoned, and without consequences. It remains unknown to what degree the RP generalizes to deliberate, more ecological decisions. We directly compared deliberate and arbitrary decision-making during a $1000-donation task to non-profit organizations. While we found the expected RPs for arbitrary decisions, they were strikingly absent for deliberate ones. Our results and drift-diffusion model are congruent with the RP representing accumulation of noisy, random fluctuations that drive arbitrary--but not deliberate--decisions. They further point to different neural mechanisms underlying deliberate and arbitrary decisions, challenging the generalizability of studies that argue for no causal role for consciousness in decision-making to real-life decisions.\n\nSignificance StatementThe extent of human free will has been debated for millennia. Previous studies demonstrated that neural precursors of action--especially the readiness potential--precede subjects reports of deciding to move. Some viewed this as evidence against free-will. However, these experiments focused on arbitrary decisions--e.g., randomly raising the left or right hand. We directly compared deliberate (actual $1000 donations to NPOs) and arbitrary decisions, and found readiness potentials before arbitrary decisions, but--critically--not before deliberate decisions. This supports the interpretation of readiness potentials as byproducts of accumulation of random fluctuations in arbitrary but not deliberate decisions and points to different neural mechanisms underlying deliberate and arbitrary choice. Hence, it challenges the generalizability of previous results from arbitrary to deliberate decisions.
- Citations
- 155
- FWCI
- 10.75
- Field percentile
- top 1%
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- The Readiness Potential reflects the internal source of action, rather than decision uncertainty
Eoin Travers, Patrick Haggard·European Journal of NeurosciencePeer-reviewed·Nov 25, 2020
- Readiness Potential Prevalence During A Deliberate Decision-making Task
Julianne Blignaut, Dawie J. van den Heever·bioRxiv·Jun 10, 2021
- Tracing the neural trajectories of evidence accumulation and motor preparation processes during voluntary decisions
Lauren Claire Fong, Paul Michael Garrett, … Daniel Feuerriegel·Imaging NeurosciencePeer-reviewed·Jan 1, 2026
- Changes of mind after movement onset: a motor-state dependent decision-making process
Ignasi Cos, Giovanni Pezzulo, Paul Cisek·bioRxiv·Feb 15, 2021
- Confusions regarding stochastic fluctuations and accumulators in spontaneous movements
Carsten Bogler, Bojana Grujičić, John–Dylan Haynes·bioRxiv·Jun 4, 2021
- The Readiness Potential reflects expectation, not uncertainty, in the timing of action
Eoin Travers, Maja Friedemann, Patrick Haggard·Cognitive NeurosciencePeer-reviewed·Nov 6, 2020