bioRxivAnimal Behavior & CognitionPreprint
Non-decision time: the Higg's boson of decision
Abstract
Generative models of decision now permeate all subfields of psychology, cognitive and clinical neuroscience. To successfully represent decision mechanisms, it is necessary to also assume the presence of delays for sensory and motor information to travel through the brain; but like the Higgs boson in particle physics, directly observing this "non-decision time" from behaviour long appeared beyond reach. Here, we describe and apply a set of methods to empirically measure and characterise the properties of non-decision time in fast visually guided decisions (without requiring modelling assumptions). We gather 11 datasets from humans and monkeys from multiple labs and validate the method by showing that visual properties (brightness, colour, size) consistently affect empirically measured non-decision time, as predicted by neurophysiology. We then show that endogenous factors (pro-active slowing, attention) consistently do not affect non-decision time, in contrast to widespread reports based on model fits. Last, contrasting empirically observed non-decision time with estimates from the EZ, DDM and LBA models, we conclude that models cannot be generally trusted to provide valid estimates, either at a group level or for individual differences, and propose a hybrid approach that combines our empirical method with standard modelling.
- organism: human
- organism: mouse
- assay: behavioral assay
- research focus: benchmarking
- approach: experimental assay
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Seeing, fast and slow: the effects of processing time on perceptual bias
Ron Dekel, Dov Sagi·Communications BiologyPeer-reviewed·Feb 10, 2020
- The latency of a visual evoked potential tracks the onset of decision making
Michael D. Nunez, Aishwarya K. Gosai, … Ramesh Srinivasan·NeuroImagePeer-reviewed·Apr 24, 2019
- Temporal expectation hastens decision onset but does not affect evidence quality
Ruud L. van den Brink, Peter R. Murphy, … Sander Nieuwenhuis·Journal of NeurosciencePeer-reviewed·Nov 10, 2020
- Non-decision time-informed collapsing threshold diffusion model: A joint modeling framework with identifiable time-dependent parameters
Amir Hosein Hadian Rasanan, Lukas Schumacher, … Jörg Rieskamp·bioRxiv·Oct 30, 2025
- Decision-making through integration of sensory evidence at prolonged timescales
Michael Waskom, Roozbeh Kiani·Current BiologyPeer-reviewed·Nov 21, 2018
- Temporal Processing during Decision Making under Uncertainty.
Rebecca J. Rabinovich, Daniel A. Feldman, … Elliot H. Smith·bioRxiv·Jul 6, 2026