Conservation Genetics ResourcesGeneticsPeer-reviewed journal article
Shed skin as a source of DNA for genotyping-by-sequencing (GBS) in reptiles
Thomas D. BrekkeiD, Liam Shier, Matthew HegartyiD, John F. MulleyiD
Abstract
Over a fifth of reptile species are classified as Threatened and conservation efforts, especially those aimed at recovery of isolated or fragmented populations, will require genetic and genomic data and resources. Shed skins of snakes and other reptiles contain DNA, are a safe and ethical way of non-invasively sampling large numbers of individuals, and provide a simple mechanism by which to involve the public in scientific research. Here we test whether the DNA in dried shed skin is suitable for reduced representation sequencing approaches, specifically genotyping-by-sequencing (GBS). Shed skin-derived libraries resulted in fewer sequenced reads than those from snap-frozen muscle samples, and contained slightly fewer variants (70,685 SNPs versus 97,724), but this issue can easily be rectified with deeper sequencing of shed skin-derived libraries. Skin-derived libraries also have a very slight (but significantly different) profile of transitions and transversions, most likely as a result of DNA damage, but the impact of this is minimal given the large number of single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) involved. SNP density tends to scale with chromosome length, and microchromosomes have a significantly higher SNP density than macrochromosomes, most likely because of their higher GC content. Overall, shed skin provides DNA of sufficient quality and quantity for the identification of large number of SNPs, but requires greater sequencing depth, and consideration of the GC richness of microchromosomes when selecting restriction enzymes.
- organism: non-human primate
- assay: whole-genome sequencing
- research focus: variant calling
- approach: statistical model
- Citations
- 5
- FWCI
- 0.66
- Field percentile
- top 33%
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Is shed hair the most effective non-invasive resource for estimating wild pedigrees?
Anubhab Khan, Kaushal Patel, … Uma Ramakrishnan·bioRxiv·Jul 28, 2019
- Balancing Barcoding and Genomics: gDNA Quality in Insect Vouchers after HotSHOT DNA extraction
Vivian Feng, Caroline Høegh-Guldberg, … Rudolf Meier·Molecular Ecology ResourcesPeer-reviewed·Feb 1, 2026
- A practical sampling strategy for biodiversity genomics of reptiles: The Cryptoblepharus pulcher assembly offers insights into the demise of a threatened relative
Tristram O. Dodge, Mario Ernst, … Mozes P. K. Blom·bioRxiv·Aug 28, 2026
- Empowering conservation practice with efficient and economical genotyping from poor quality samples
Meghana Natesh, Ryan W. Taylor, … Uma Ramakrishnan·Methods in Ecology and EvolutionPeer-reviewed·Apr 10, 2019
- Genetic characterization of a captive marmoset colony using genotype-by-sequencing
Shelley A. Cole, Martha M. Lyke, … IH Cheeseman·bioRxiv·Jun 22, 2023
- More affordable and effective noninvasive SNP genotyping using high-throughput amplicon sequencing
C. E. Eriksson, J. Ruprecht, T. Levi·bioRxiv·Sep 24, 2019