henhaobio
Sign in

Methods in Ecology and EvolutionGenomicsPeer-reviewed journal article

Empowering conservation practice with efficient and economical genotyping from poor quality samples

Meghana NateshiD, Ryan W. TayloriD, Nathan K. TrueloveiD, Elizabeth A. HadlyiD, Stephen R. PalumbiiD, Dmitri A. PetroviD, Uma RamakrishnaniD

PDFDOIPreprint

Abstract

O_LIModerate to high density genotyping (100+ SNPs) is widely used to determine and measure individual identity, relatedness, fitness, population structure and migration in wild populations. C_LIO_LIHowever, these important tools are difficult to apply when high-quality genetic material is unavailable. Most genomic tools are developed for high quality DNA sources from labor medical settings. As a result, most genetic data from market or field settings is limited to easily amplified mitochondrial DNA or a few microsatellites. C_LIO_LITo enable genotyping in conservation contexts, we used next-generation sequencing of multiplex PCR products from very low-quality DNA extracted from feces, hair, and cooked samples. We demonstrated utility and wide-ranging potential application in endangered wild tigers and tracking commercial trade in Caribbean queen conch. C_LIO_LIWe genotyped 100 SNPs from degraded tiger samples to identify individuals, discern close relatives, and detect population differentiation. Co-occurring carnivores do not amplify (e.g. Indian wild dog/Dhole) or are monomorphic (e.g. leopard). 62 SNPs from conch fritters and field-collected samples were used to test relatedness and detect population structure. C_LIO_LIWe provide proof-of-concept for a rapid, simple, cost-effective, and scalable method (for both samples and number of loci), a framework that can be applied to other conservation scenarios previously limited by low quality DNA samples. These approaches provide a critical advance for wildlife monitoring and forensics, open the door to field-ready testing, and will strengthen the use of science in policy decisions and wildlife trade. C_LI

Citations
67
FWCI
5.12
Field percentile
top 4%

Reproducibility ledger

Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.

Sign in to file a reproducibility report.

Similarity Map
SelectedSame fieldCross-field
THISKhan '19Eriksson '19Barba '26Schweizer '21Lévêque '24Mamugy '24
63% semantic matchGenomics
Anubhab Khan, Kaushal Patel, Subhadeep Bhattacharjee+7 more·bioRxiv·Jul 28, 2019