bioRxivPhysiologyPreprint
How do we tread? Differences in stability-related foot placement control between overground and treadmill walking in young adults
Charlotte Lang, Deepak Kumar RaviiD, Sjoerd M. BruijniD, Jeffrey M. HausdorffiD, Jaap H. van DieëniD, Moira van LeeuweniD
Abstract
Step-by-step foot placement control, accommodating for natural variations in center-of-mass state, ensures stability during steady-state gait. Current understanding of this foot placement mechanisms is primarily based on findings during treadmill walking. However, contextual differences might hamper generalization of these findings towards overground walking, and ultimately daily life gait. This study investigated whether foot placement control manifests itself differently during overground as compared to treadmill walking in healthy young adults. 14 young adults walked at comfortable walking speed, both on the treadmill and overground in a figure-8 path. During overground walking we found a significant relationship between the step width/step length and the center-of-mass state during the swing phase of walking, capturing foot placement control with the same linear model as during treadmill walking. Contrary to what was hypothesized, we found a significant lower foot placement precision during overground walking for the step width model with center-of-mass state at the start of the swing phase as predictor, complemented by a wider average step width. Moreover, during overground walking participants responded less strongly to a deviation in center-of-mass position, yet significantly stronger to deviations in center-of-mass velocity at the end of the step for both the step width/step length models. Exploratory analysis showed a larger relative contribution of velocity feedback during over ground walking as compared to treadmill walking. These differences warrant caution in generalizing foot placement findings during treadmill walking to overground walking and might be promising for the estimation of foot placement control in daily life gait.
- Citations
- 2
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Active foot placement control ensures stable gait: Effect of constraints on foot placement and ankle moments
A.M. van Leeuwen, Jaap H. van Dieën, … Sjoerd M. Bruijn·PLoS ONEPeer-reviewed·Dec 17, 2020
- Mediolateral foot placement control can be trained: Older adults learn to walk more stable, when ankle moments are constrained
M. Mahaki, A. M. van Leeuwen, … J. H. van Dieen·bioRxiv·Mar 10, 2023
- Differential effects of ankle constraints on foot placement control between normal and split belt treadmills
M. Hos, L. van Iersel, … S. M. Bruijn·bioRxiv·Jul 18, 2022
- Generalizability of foot-placement control strategies during unperturbed and perturbed gait
C. Liu, F. J. Valero-Cuevas, J. M. Finley·bioRxiv·Jul 10, 2023
- Can foot placement during gait be trained? Adaptations in stability control when ankle moments are constrained
L. A. Hoogstad, A. M. van Leeuwen, … S. M. Bruijn·bioRxiv·Aug 13, 2021
- Ankle muscles drive mediolateral center of pressure control to ensure stable steady state gait
A. M. van Leeuwen, Jaap H. van Dieën, … Sjoerd M. Bruijn·Scientific ReportsPeer-reviewed·Nov 2, 2021