Mediolateral foot placement control can be trained: Older adults learn to walk more stable, when ankle moments are constrained
M. Mahaki, A. M. van Leeuwen, N. van der Velde, S. M. Bruijn, J. H. van Dieen
Abstract
Falls are a problem, especially for older adults. Placing our feet accurately relative to the center-of-mass helps us to prevent falling during gait. The degree of foot placement control with respect to the center-of mass kinematic state is decreased in older as compared to young adults. Here, we attempted to train mediolateral foot placement control in healthy older adults. Ten older adults trained by walking on shoes with a narrow ridge underneath (LesSchuh), restricting mediolateral center-of-pressure shifts. As a training effect, we expected improved foot placement control during normal walking. A training session consisted of a normal walking condition, followed by a training condition on LesSchuh and finally an after-effect condition. Participants performed six of such training sessions, spread across three weeks. As a control, before the first training session, we included two similar sessions, but on normal shoes only. We evaluated whether a training effect was observed across sessions and weeks in a repeated-measures design. Whilst walking with LesSchuh, the magnitude of foot placement error reduced half-a-millimeter between sessions within a week (cohens d=0.394). As a training effect in normal walking, the magnitude of foot placement errors was significantly lower compared to the control week, by one millimeter in weeks 2 (cohens d=0.686) and 3 (cohens d=0.780) and by two millimeters in week 4 (cohens d=0.875). Local dynamic stability of normal walking also improved significantly. More precise foot placement may thus have led to improved stability. It remains to be determined whether the training effects were the result of walking on LesSchuh or from repeated treadmill walking itself. Moreover, enhancement of mechanisms beyond the scope of our outcome measures may have improved stability. At the retention test, gait stability returned to similar levels as in the control week. Yet, a reduction in foot placement error persisted.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Organism
- Assay
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Can foot placement during gait be trained? Adaptations in stability control when ankle moments are constrained
L. A. Hoogstad, A. M. van Leeuwen, … S. M. Bruijn·bioRxiv·Aug 13, 2021
- Active foot placement control ensures stable gait: Effect of constraints on foot placement and ankle moments
A.M. van Leeuwen, Jaap H. van Dieën, … Sjoerd M. Bruijn·PLoS ONEPeer-reviewed·Dec 17, 2020
- Force-field perturbations and muscle vibration strengthen stability-related foot placement responses during steady-state gait
A. M. van Leeuwen, Sjoerd M. Bruijn, Jesse C. Dean·Human Movement SciencePeer-reviewed·Jun 12, 2024
- How do we tread? Differences in stability-related foot placement control between overground and treadmill walking in young adults
Charlotte Lang, Deepak Kumar Ravi, … Moira van Leeuwen·bioRxiv·Sep 10, 2025
- The effect of external lateral stabilization on ankle moment control during steady-state walking
A. M. van Leeuwen, J. H. van Dieen, S. M. Bruijn·bioRxiv·Apr 29, 2022
- Does ankle push-off correct for errors in anterior-posterior foot placement relative to center-of-mass states?
J. Jin, J. H. van Dieen, … S. M. Bruijn·bioRxiv·Mar 14, 2022