Biological Reasoning with Reinforcement Learning through Natural Language Enables Generalizable Zero-Shot Cell Type Annotations
Abstract
Single-cell RNA-sequencing (scRNAseq) has reshaped biomedical research, enabling the high-resolution characterization of cellular populations. Yet cell type annotation, a process typically performed by domain experts interpreting gene expression patterns by manual curation or with specialized algorithms, remains labor-intensive and limited by prior knowledge. In addition, while reasoning large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated remarkable performance on mathematics, coding and general-reasoning benchmarks, their potential in scRNAseq analyses remains underexplored. Here, we investigate the advantages and limitations of employing DeepSeek-R1-0528, a recently developed open-source 671B-parameter reasoning LLM, for zero-shot scRNAseq cell type annotation. We find that DeepSeek-R1 prompted with a ranked list of 10 differentially expressed marker genes per cluster of single cells outperforms both its reasoning-enhanced, non-reasoning equivalent (DeepSeek-V3-0324) and GPT-4o in cluster-level annotations. At the level of single cells, DeepSeek-R1 prompted with the top 500 expressed genes in a cell outperforms its non-reasoning counterpart DeepSeek-V3, illustrating test-time scaling for bioinformatics tasks through natural language. Running DeepSeek-R1 in zero-shot classifier mode, with a prompt that presents a broad catalogue of cell type labels to choose from, improves its performance and generalizability across different datasets. On data curated by the expert model scTab (termed in-domain data), the DeepSeek-R1 classifiers perform better than the expert model scGPT and on par with the specialized cell genomics LLM C2S-Scale-1B, but lag behind scTab. On out-of-distribution data unseen by the two expert models, DeepSeek-R1 and its classifier versions generalize better and outperform the other models in the majority of the evaluated datasets. Notably, DeepSeek-R1 supports its cell type calls with interpretable textual biological rationales underlying its reasoning, providing a learning opportunity for researchers. Nevertheless, peak annotation performance remains modest, highlighting the intrinsic complexity of scRNAseq cell type annotation.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 1
- Assay
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- CellReasoner: A reasoning-enhanced large language model for cell type annotation
Guangshuo Cao, Yiming Shen, … Dijun Chen·Journal of genetics and genomics/Journal of Genetics and GenomicsPeer-reviewed·Nov 27, 2025
- Large Language Model Consensus Substantially Improves the Cell Type Annotation Accuracy for scRNA-seq Data
Yang Chen, Xianyang Zhang, Jun Chen·Communications BiologyPeer-reviewed·Jun 8, 2026
- scDeepInsight: a supervised cell-type identification method for scRNA-seq data with deep learning
Shangru Jia, Artem Lysenko, … Tatsuhiko Tsunoda·Briefings in BioinformaticsPeer-reviewed·Jul 5, 2023
- scChat: A Large Language Model-Powered Co-Pilot for Contextualized Single-Cell RNA Sequencing Analysis
Hsuan-Han Chiu, Ashley Varghese, … C. Li·AIChE JournalPeer-reviewed·Feb 11, 2026
- CASSIA: a multi-agent large language model for reference free, interpretable, and automated cell annotation of single-cell RNA-sequencing data
Elliot Xie, Lingxin Cheng, … Christina M. Kendziorski·bioRxiv·Dec 4, 2024
- scBERT as a Large-scale Pretrained Deep Language Model for Cell Type Annotation of Single-cell RNA-seq Data
Fan Yang, Wenchuan Wang, … Jianhua Yao·Nature Machine IntelligencePeer-reviewed·Sep 26, 2022