Magnetic Resonance in MedicineNeurosciencePeer-reviewed journal article
QSM Reconstruction Challenge 2.0: a realistic in silico head phantom for MRI data simulation and evaluation of susceptibility mapping procedures
José P. MarquesiD, Jakob MeinekeiD, Carlos MiloviciD, Berkin BilgiçiD, Kwok‐Shing ChaniD, Renaud HédouiniD, Wietske van der ZwaagiD, Christian LangkammeriD, Ferdinand SchweseriD
Abstract
PurposeTo create a realistic in-silico head phantom for the second Quantitative Susceptibility Mapping (QSM) Reconstruction Challenge and for future evaluations of processing algorithms for QSM. MethodsWe created a digital whole-head tissue property phantom by segmenting and post-processing high-resolution (0.64mm isotropic), multi-parametric MRI data acquired at 7T from a healthy volunteer. We simulated the steady-state magnetization at 7T using a Bloch simulator and mimicked a Cartesian sampling scheme through Fourier-based processing. Computer code for generating the phantom and performing the MR simulation was designed to facilitate flexible modifications of the phantom in the future, such as the inclusion of pathologies, as well as the simulation of a wide range of acquisition protocols. Specifically, the following parameters and effects were implemented: repetition time and echo time, voxel size, background fields, and RF phase biases. Diffusion weighted imaging phantom data is provided allowing future investigations of tissue microstructure effects in phase and QSM algorithms. ResultsThe brain-part of the phantom featured realistic morphology with spatial variations in relaxation and susceptibility values similar to the in vivo setting. We demonstrated some of the phantoms properties, including the possibility of generating phase data with non-linear evolution over echo time due to partial volume effects or complex distributions of frequency shifts within the voxel. ConclusionThe presented phantom and computer programs are publicly available and may serve as a ground truth in future assessments of the faithfulness of quantitative susceptibility reconstruction algorithms.
- Citations
- 62
- FWCI
- 5.41
- Field percentile
- top 3%
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- QSM Reconstruction Challenge 2.0: Design and Report of Results
Berkin Bilgiç, Christian Langkammer, … Ferdinand Schweser·Magnetic Resonance in MedicinePeer-reviewed·Mar 30, 2021
- Validation of Data Acquisition and Phase Estimation for Quantitative Susceptibility Mapping with a Rotating-Tube Phantom
K. E. Keenan, B. P. Berman, … J. Dagher·bioRxiv·Jun 29, 2021
- A geometric anthropomorphic phantom for quantitative susceptibility mapping: accuracy and repeatability
Padriac Hooper, Jin Jin, … Markus Barth·bioRxiv·Sep 2, 2026
- Evaluation of phantom doping materials in quantitative susceptibility mapping
Padriac Hooper, Jin Jin, … Markus Barth·Magnetic Resonance in MedicinePeer-reviewed·Jun 25, 2026
- QSMxT: Robust Masking and Artefact Reduction for Quantitative Susceptibility Mapping
Ashley Wilton Stewart, Simon Robinson, … Steffen Bollmann·Magnetic Resonance in MedicinePeer-reviewed·Oct 22, 2021
- A realistic in-silico brain phantom for quantifying susceptibility anisotropy-induced error in susceptibility separation
Daniel Ridani, Benjamin De Leener, Eva Alonso‐Ortiz·Magnetic Resonance in MedicinePeer-reviewed·Jul 9, 2026