Magnetic Resonance in MedicineNeurosciencePeer-reviewed journal article
QSMxT: Robust Masking and Artefact Reduction for Quantitative Susceptibility Mapping
Ashley Wilton StewartiD, Simon RobinsoniD, Kieran O’BrieniD, Jin JiniD, Georg WidhalmiD, Gilbert J. HangeliD, Angela Catherine WallsiD, Jonathan Goodwin, Korbinian EcksteiniD, Monique C. TourelliD, Catherine MorganiD, Aswin NarayananiD, Markus BarthiD, Steffen BollmanniD
Abstract
PurposeQuantitative Susceptibility Mapping (QSM) is a post-processing technique applied to gradient-echo phase data. QSM algorithms require a signal mask to delineate regions with reliable phase signal for subsequent susceptibility estimation. Existing masking techniques used in QSM have limitations that introduce artefacts, exclude anatomical detail, and rely on parameter tuning and anatomical priors that narrow their application. Here, a robust masking and reconstruction procedure is presented to overcome these limitations and enable automated QSM processing for a wide range of use-cases implemented in an open-source software framework: QSMxT. MethodsA robust masking technique that automatically separates reliable from less reliable phase regions was developed and combined with a two-pass reconstruction procedure that operates on the separated sources before combination, extracting more information while reducing the influence of artefacts. ResultCompared with standard masking and reconstruction procedures, the two-pass inversion reduces streaking artefacts caused by unreliable phase and high dynamic ranges of susceptibility sources. QSMxT is robust across a range of datasets at 3 T in healthy volunteers and phantoms, at 7 T in tumour patients, and in the QSM challenge 2.0 simulated brain dataset, with significant artefact and error reductions, greater anatomical detail, and minimal parameter tuning. ConclusionQSMxT generates masks for QSM that separate reliable from less reliable phase regions, enables a more accurate QSM reconstruction that mitigates artefacts, operates without anatomical priors, and requires minimal parameter tuning. QSMxT makes QSM processing more accessible, reliable and reproducible.
- Citations
- 39
- FWCI
- 2.11
- Field percentile
- top 13%
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Abdominal single-step quantitative susceptibility mapping with spherical mean value filter and structure prior-based regularization
A. Abyzov, B. E. Van Beers, P. Garteiser·bioRxiv·Jul 15, 2020
- The Effect of Oblique Image Acquisition on the Accuracy of Quantitative Susceptibility Mapping and a Robust Tilt Correction Method
O. C. Kiersnowski, A. Karsa, … K. Shmueli·bioRxiv·Nov 30, 2021
- Validation of Data Acquisition and Phase Estimation for Quantitative Susceptibility Mapping with a Rotating-Tube Phantom
K. E. Keenan, B. P. Berman, … J. Dagher·bioRxiv·Jun 29, 2021
- QSM Reconstruction Challenge 2.0: a realistic in silico head phantom for MRI data simulation and evaluation of susceptibility mapping procedures
José P. Marques, Jakob Meineke, … Ferdinand Schweser·Magnetic Resonance in MedicinePeer-reviewed·Feb 26, 2021
- QSM Reconstruction Challenge 2.0: Design and Report of Results
Berkin Bilgiç, Christian Langkammer, … Ferdinand Schweser·Magnetic Resonance in MedicinePeer-reviewed·Mar 30, 2021
- SEPIA - SuscEptibility mapping PIpeline tool for phAse images
Kwok‐Shing Chan, José P. Marques·NeuroImagePeer-reviewed·Dec 10, 2020