bioRxivBioinformaticsPreprint
A low-annotation-budget PubMedBERT classifier for chondrogenesis regulator discovery via active learning
Ana Mariya AnheliD, Mandy Jayne PeffersiD, David Alan YoungiD, Jamie SouliD
Abstract
Motivation: Biomedical natural language processing (Bio-NLP) classification tasks are often limited by the cost of manual annotation, especially for specialised extraction problems where labelled corpora are scarce. Active learning can reduce this cost by prioritising informative samples, while large language models (LLMs) avoid task-specific annotation, but at high computational cost. We ask whether an encoder trained via active learning can match LLM performance at a lower computational cost, using identification of chondrogenesis regulators from PubMed abstracts as a test case applicable to other under-annotated Bio-NLP problems. Results: We built an active learning framework to fine-tune PubMedBERT to classify gene mentions as regulators of chondrocyte differentiation, achieving an AUC-ROC of 0.93 using 1,238 annotated sentences. Against open-weight LLMs (Qwen3, Llama-3.1), PubMedBERT matched the top-performing LLMs on AUC-ROC and achieved the highest precision (0.69) of any model, while classifying the full corpus far faster. Applied to 67,111 gene mentions, it identified 1,128 candidate regulators, recovered 79% of Gene Ontology-annotated genes related to chondrocyte differentiation (94 genes recovered), and proposed 981 new candidates. The pipeline is agnostic to the target process, suggesting it could be adapted to identify regulators of other biological processes. Availability and Implementation: Code is available at https://github.com/ChondroTextomics/ALRegulatorDiscovery. Data are available at Zenodo: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.22746090. Final model is available in HuggingFace Hub amav/pubmedbert-chondrogenesis-classifier Supplementary information: Supplementary data are available in a separate file
- Citations
- 0
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Large Language Models to process, analyze, and synthesize biomedical texts - a scoping review
Simona Emilova Doneva, Sijing Qin, … Benjamin Victor Ineichen·bioRxiv·Apr 19, 2024
- Accurate Name Entity Recognition for Biomedical Literatures: A Combined High-quality Manual Annotation and Deep-learning Natural Language Processing Study
Dao‐Ling Huang, Quanlei Zeng, … Yuying Yuan·bioRxiv·Sep 15, 2021
- A BERT-Based Hybrid System for Chemical Identification and Indexing in Full-Text Articles
Arslan Erdengasileng, Keqiao Li, … Jinfeng Zhang·bioRxiv·Oct 27, 2021
- On the effectiveness of small, discriminatively pre-trained language representation models for biomedical text mining
İbrahim Burak Özyurt·Workshop on Scholarly Document Processing (SDP)Peer-reviewed·Jan 1, 2020
- BioAct: Biomedical Knowledge Base Construction using Active Learning
Dustin Wright, Anna Lisa Gentile, … Kristen L. Beck·bioRxiv·Apr 14, 2022
- A Comprehensive Benchmark Study on Biomedical Text Generation and Mining with ChatGPT
Qijie Chen, Haotong Sun, … Hongming Chen·bioRxiv·Apr 19, 2023