Scientific ReportsNeurosciencePeer-reviewed journal article
Statistical determinants of visuomotor adaption along different dimensions during naturalistic 3D reaches
Enrico FerreaiD, J. Franke, Pierre MoreliD, Alexander GailiD
Abstract
Neurorehabilitation in patients suffering from motor deficits relies on relearning or re-adapting motor skills. Yet our understanding of motor learning is based mostly on results from one or two-dimensional experimental paradigms with highly confined movements. Since everyday movements are conducted in three-dimensional space, it is important to further our understanding about the effect that gravitational forces or perceptual anisotropy might or might not have on motor learning along all different dimensions relative to the body. Here we test how well existing concepts of motor learning generalize to movements in 3D. We ask how a subjects variability in movement planning and sensory perception influences motor adaptation along three different body axes. To extract variability and relate it to adaptation rate, we employed a novel hierarchical two-state space model using Bayesian modeling via Hamiltonian Monte Carlo procedures. Our results show that differences in adaptation rate occur between the coronal, sagittal and horizontal planes and can be explained by the Kalman gain, i.e., a statistically optimal solution integrating planning and sensory information weighted by the inverse of their variability. This indicates that optimal integration theory for error correction holds for 3D movements and explains adaptation rate variation between movements in different planes.
- Citations
- 15
- FWCI
- 1.68
- Field percentile
- top 18%
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Target configuration determines how and what we learn during sensorimotor adaptation
Pamela Villavicencio, Jonathan Sanching Tsay, Cristina de la Malla·npj Science of LearningPeer-reviewed·Dec 16, 2025
- Task relevance selectively modulates sensorimotor adaptation in the presence of multiple prediction errors.
Somesh N Shingane, Nishant Rao, … Pratik K. Mutha·Journal of NeurophysiologyPeer-reviewed·Jul 17, 2025
- Adapting to visuomotor rotations in stepped increments increases implicit motor learning
Shanaathanan Modchalingam, Marco Ciccone, … Denise Y. P. Henriques·Scientific ReportsPeer-reviewed·Mar 28, 2023
- Sensorimotor adaptation and cue reweighting compensate for distorted 3D information, accounting for paradoxical perception-action dissociations
Evan Cesanek, Jordan A. Taylor, Fulvio Domini A·Journal of NeurophysiologyPeer-reviewed·Feb 26, 2020
- Did we get sensorimotor adaptation wrong? Implicit adaptation as direct policy updating rather than forward-model-based learning
Alkis M. Hadjiosif, John W. Krakauer, Adrian Mark Haith·Journal of NeurosciencePeer-reviewed·Feb 8, 2021
- A very fast time scale of human motor adaptation: within movement adjustments of internal representations during reaching
Frédéric Crevecoeur, Jean‐Louis Thonnard, Philippe Lefèvre·eNeuroPeer-reviewed·Jan 1, 2020