Performance and limitations of out-of-distribution detection for insect DNA (meta)barcoding
Abstract
Successful applications of DNA barcoding/metabarcoding rely on the accurate taxonomic identification of sequence fragments. When biological surveys with DNA (meta)barcoding target underexplored biological communities, sequence-based identification is often conducted using incomplete databases that do not fully cover the regional species pool. Consequently, specimens to be identified may include species not present in reference databases. Such unknown or "out-of-distribution" samples can cause misidentification if left undetected. A similarity cutoff is commonly used to detect out-of-distribution samples before taxonomic assignment, but its effectiveness has not been carefully studied. In this study, we evaluated the performance of out-of-distribution detection for DNA barcoding with genetic distance and deep learning metrics. Using extensively sampled datasets of multiple insect taxa, we measured the performance of identification and out-of-distribution detection under conditions in which genetic variations in species were sufficiently sampled. Although identification with DNA barcoding is a highly accurate process, even with short noisy fragments, out-of-distribution detection was more susceptible to a reduction in performance due to sequence noise and a lack of diagnosable characters. Our results provide guidelines for designing unknown-proof identification procedures by determining factors affecting out-of-distribution detection performance.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 6
- FWCI
- 21.14
- Field percentile
- top 1%
- Assay
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Discovering the unseen: a performance comparison of taxonomic classification methods under unknown DNA barcodes
Johanna Orsholm, Alessandro Zito, … Brendan Furneaux·Methods in Ecology and EvolutionPeer-reviewed·Jul 16, 2026
- Quantifying uncertainty of taxonomic placement in DNA barcoding and metabarcoding
Panu Somervuo, Douglas W. Yu, … Otso Ovaskainen·bioRxiv·Aug 19, 2016
- Forensics and DNA Barcodes - Do Identification Errors Arise in the Lab or in the Sequence Libraries?
Mikko Pentinsaari, Sujeevan Ratnasingham, … Paul D. N. Hebert·PLoS ONEPeer-reviewed·Apr 16, 2020
- Establishing insect community composition using metabarcoding of soil samples, and preservative ethanol and homogenate from Malaise trap catches: surprising inconsistencies between methods.
D. Marquina, R. Esparza-Salas, … F. Ronquist·bioRxiv·Apr 2, 2019
- Computational Evaluation of DNA Metabarcoding for Universal Diagnostics of Invasive Insect Pests
Alexander M. Piper, Noel O. I. Cogan, … Mark J. Blacket·bioRxiv·Mar 16, 2021
- Is there a fly in my soup? To what extent do metabarcoding and individual barcoding tell the same story?
Brendan Furneaux, Tomas V. Roslin, … Otso Ovaskainen·Molecular Ecology ResourcesPeer-reviewed·Sep 11, 2026