Sign in
NeuroscienceScience Advances
Peer-reviewed journal article

Integrative processing in artificial and biological vision predicts the perceived beauty of natural images

Sanjeev NaraiD, DANIEL H. KAISERiD

Abstract

Previous research indicates that the beauty of natural images is already determined during perceptual analysis. However, it is still largely unclear which perceptual computations give rise to the perception of beauty. Theories of processing fluency suggest that the ease of processing for an image determines its perceived beauty. Here, we tested whether perceived beauty is related to the amount of spatial integration across an image, a perceptual computation that reduces processing demands by aggregating image elements into more efficient representations of the whole. We hypothesized that higher degrees of integration reduce processing demands in the visual system and thereby predispose the perception of beauty. We quantified integrative processing in an artificial deep neural network model of vision: We compared activations between parts of the image and the whole image, where the degree of integration was determined by the amount of deviation between activations for the whole image and its constituent parts. This quantification of integration predicted the beauty ratings for natural images across four studies, which featured different stimuli and task demands. In a complementary fMRI study, we show that integrative processing in human visual cortex predicts perceived beauty in a similar way as in artificial neural networks. Together, our results establish integration as a computational principle that facilitates perceptual analysis and thereby mediates the perception of beauty.

PDFDOI

02 /Specification & Classification

Click any tag to browse matching papers
Citations
10
FWCI
2.42
Field percentile
top 12%

Reproducibility ledger

Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.

Sign in to file a reproducibility report.

Similarity Map
SelectedSame fieldCross-field
THISIigaya '20Schumann '26Flieger '26Rasche '23KAISER '22Chuan-Peng '20
70% semantic matchNeuroscience
Kiyohito Iigaya, Sanghyun Yi, Iman A. Wahle+2 more·bioRxiv·Feb 9, 2020· 35 citations