medRxivGenetic & Genomic MedicinePreprint
DISCRIMINATOR: Assigning Cohort-Wide Provisional Pathogenicity Classifications to CNVs
Alyssa S. WetzeliD, Heather J. MajoriD, Mrutyunjaya ParidaiD, John Robert ManakiD, Benjamin W. DarbroiD
Abstract
The interpretation of clinical chromosomal microarrays (CMAs) has historically relied on the relevance of identified copy number variants (CNVs) to the clinical phenotype. New interpretation guidelines are focused on standardizing pathogenicity classifications based on genomic location, gene content, and previous publications, rather than the immediate clinical relevance. Here we report on DISCRIMINATOR, which was developed to assign provisional pathogenicity classifications based on genomic location by integrating information on putative benign and pathogenic loci in the human genome. However, its application extends beyond that of a simple classifier. The novel utility of DISCRIMINATOR is its ability to operate on a cohort-level and easily integrate updated definitions of benign and pathogenic regions of the human genome. We used DISCRIMINATOR to assign provisional pathogenicity classifications ( Benign, Secondary, Primary or Non-Coding) to 87,808 CNVs in 3,362 cases ascertained through clinical CMA testing. The majority of identified CNVs were provisionally classified as Benign or Non-Coding and consistent with their prevalence rates, 15q11.2, 16p11.2, and 22q11.2 were the most common Primary CNVs detected. Targeted re-analysis led to the identification of several cases where DISCRIMINATOR identified a Primary CNV within a case that had a non-Abnormal CMA test result, and several cases where only benign and/or non-coding CNVs were identified in reports with a VUS CMA test result. Together these results show the utility of large-scale re-analysis of CMA data and how DISCRIMINATOR addresses this long-standing challenge.
- organism: human
- assay: whole-genome sequencing
- research focus: variant calling
- approach: statistical model
- Citations
- 1
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Combination of Expert Guidelines-based and MachineLearning-based Approaches Leads to Superior Accuracy ofAutomated Prediction of Clinical Effect of Copy Number Variations
Tomáš Sládeček, Michaela Gažiová, … Tomáš Szemes·Scientific ReportsPeer-reviewed·Jun 29, 2023
- CNV-ClinViewer: Enhancing the clinical interpretation of large copy-number variants online
Marie Macnee, Eduardo Pérez‐Palma, … Dennis Lal·medRxiv·Mar 23, 2022
- ClassifyCNV: a tool for clinical annotation of copy-number variants
Tatiana A. Gurbich, Valery Vladimirovich Ilinsky·Scientific ReportsPeer-reviewed·Nov 23, 2020
- CNVscore calculates pathogenicity scores for copy number variants together with uncertainty estimates accounting for learning biases in reference Mendelian disorder datasets.
Francisco Requena, David Salgado, … Antonio Rausell·medRxiv·Jun 23, 2022
- Automated prediction of the clinical impact of structural copy number variations
Michaela Gažiová, Tomáš Sládeček, … Tomáš Szemes·Scientific ReportsPeer-reviewed·Jan 11, 2022
- Horizon: CNV interpretation through rapid automated ACMG-aligned pathogenicity analysis
Mariam Eldesouky, Suhana Shiyas, … Nasna Nassir·Human GeneticsPeer-reviewed·Feb 19, 2026