Virtual ChIP-seq: Predicting transcription factor binding by learning from the transcriptome
Abstract
MotivationIdentifying transcription factor binding sites is the first step in pinpointing non-coding mutations that disrupt the regulatory function of transcription factors and promote disease. ChIP-seq is the most common method for identifying binding sites, but performing it on patient samples is hampered by the amount of available biological material and the cost of the experiment. Existing methods for computational prediction of regulatory elements primarily predict binding in genomic regions with sequence similarity to known transcription factor sequence preferences. This has limited efficacy since most binding sites do not resemble known transcription factor sequence motifs, and many transcription factors are not even sequence-specific. ResultsWe developed Virtual ChIP-seq, which predicts binding of individual transcription factors in new cell types using an artificial neural network that integrates ChIP-seq results from other cell types and chromatin accessibility data in the new cell type. Virtual ChIP-seq also uses learned associations between gene expression and transcription factor binding at specific genomic regions. This approach outperforms methods that predict TF binding solely based on sequence preference, pre-dicting binding for 36 transcription factors (Matthews correlation coefficient > 0.3). AvailabilityThe datasets we used for training and validation are available at https://virchip.hoffmanlab.org. We have deposited in Zenodo the current version of our software (http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1066928), datasets (http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.823297), predictions for 36 transcription factors on Roadmap Epigenomics cell types (http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1455759), and predictions in Cistrome as well as ENCODE-DREAM in vivo TF Binding Site Prediction Challenge (http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1209308).
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 32
- FWCI
- 1.88
- Field percentile
- top 13%
- Organism
- Assay
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Learning from mistakes: Accurate prediction of cell type-specific transcription factor binding
Jens Keilwagen, Stefan Posch, Jan Grau·bioRxiv·Jun 12, 2018
- Combining transcription factor binding affinities with open-chromatin data for accurate gene expression prediction
Florian Schmidt, Nina Gasparoni, … Marcel H. Schulz·Nucleic Acids ResearchPeer-reviewed·Oct 24, 2016
- LR-DNase: Predicting TF binding from DNase-seq data
Arjan van der Velde, Michael J. Purcaro, … Zhiping Weng·bioRxiv·Oct 24, 2016
- Integrating Protein and DNA Embeddings for Improving Genome-Wide Transcription Factor Binding Site Prediction
Shreya Basnet, Jianlin Jack Cheng·NAR Genomics and BioinformaticsPeer-reviewed·Mar 27, 2026
- Identification of mammalian transcription factors that bind to inaccessible chromatin
Romana T Pop, Alessandra Pisante, … Nicolae Radu Zabet·Nucleic Acids ResearchPeer-reviewed·Jul 11, 2023
- Computational prediction and characterization of cell-type-specific and shared binding sites
Qinhu Zhang, Pengrui Teng, … De-Shuang Huang·BioinformaticsPeer-reviewed·Dec 9, 2022