henhaobio
Sign in

DatabaseBioinformaticsPeer-reviewed journal article

Increasing metadata coverage of SRA BioSample entries using deep learning based Named Entity Recognition

Adam KlieiD, Brian TsuiiD, Shamim Ara MollahiD, Dylan SkolaiD, Michelle T. Dow, Chun-Nan Hsu, Hannah K. CarteriD

PDFDOIPreprintCode

Abstract

High quality metadata annotations for data hosted in large public repositories are essential for research reproducibility, and for conducting fast, powerful and scalable meta-analyses. Currently, a majority of sequencing samples in the National Center for Biotechnology Informations (NCBIs) Sequence Read Archive (SRA) are missing metadata across several categories. In an effort to improve the metadata coverage of these samples, we leveraged almost 44 million attribute-value pairs from SRA BioSample to train a scalable, recurrent neural network that predicts missing metadata via Named Entity Recognition (NER). The network was first trained to classify short text phrases according to 11 metadata categories and achieved an overall accuracy and area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUROC) curve of 85.2% and 0.977 respectively. We then applied our classifier to predict 11 metadata categories from the longer TITLE attribute of samples, evaluating performance on a set of samples withheld from model training. Prediction accuracies were high when extracting sample Species (94.85%), Condition/Disease (95.65%) and Strain (82.03%) from TITLEs, with lower accuracies and lack of predictions for other categories highlighting multiple issues with the current metadata annotations in BioSample. These results indicate the utility of recurrent neural networks for NER-based metadata prediction and the potential for models such as the one presented here to increase metadata coverage in BioSample while minimizing the need for manual curation. AvailabilityAll the analyses, environments, and Jupyter notebooks pertaining to this manuscript are available on Github: https://github.com/cartercompbio/PredictMEE.

Citations
21
FWCI
1.18
Field percentile
top 23%

Reproducibility ledger

Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.

Sign in to file a reproducibility report.

Similarity Map
SelectedSame fieldCross-field
THISBernstein '17Wartmann '20Hak '26Choudhary '19Giorgi '19Bortoletto '24
69% semantic matchBioinformatics
Matthew N. Bernstein, AnHai Doan, Colin N. Dewey·Bioinformatics·May 21, 2017· 86 citations