bioRxivEcologyPreprint
Reducing error and increasing reliability of wildlife counts from citizen science surveys: counting Weddell Seals in the Ross Sea from satellite images
L. Salas, M. LaRue, N. Nur, D. Ainley, S. Stammerjohn, J. Pennycook, J. Rotella, J. T. Paterson, D. Siniff, K. Stamatiou, M. Dozier, J. Saints, L. Barrington
Abstract
Citizen science programs can be effective at collecting information at large temporal and spatial scales. However, sampling bias is a concern in citizen science datasets and can lead to unreliable estimates. We address this issue with a novel approach in a first-of-its-kind citizen science survey of Weddell seals for the entire coast of Antarctica. Our citizen scientists inspected very high-resolution satellite images to tag any presumptive seals hauled out on the fast ice during the pupping period. To assess and reduce the error in counts in term of bias and other factors, we ranked surveyors on how well they agreed with each other in tagging a particular feature (presumptive seal), and then ranked these features based on the ranking of surveyors placing tags on them. We assumed that features with higher rankings, as determined by "the crowd wisdom," were likely to be seals. By comparing citizen science feature ranks with an experts determination, we found that non-seal features were often highly ranked. Conversely, some seals were ranked low or not tagged at all. Ranking surveyors relative to their peers was not a reliable means to filter out erroneous or missed tags; therefore, we developed an effective correction factor for both sources of error by comparing surveyors tags to those by the expert. Furthermore, counts may underestimate true abundance due to seals not being present on the ice when the image was taken. Based on available on-the-ground haul-out location counts in Erebus Bay, the Ross Sea, we were able to correct for the proportion of seals not detected through satellite images after accounting for year, time-of-day, location (islet vs. mainland locations), and satellite sensor effects. We show that a prospective model performed well at estimating seal abundances at appropriate spatial scales, providing a suitable methodology for continent-wide Weddell Seal population estimates.
- organism: non-human primate
- assay: imaging
- research focus: ecology & biodiversity
- approach: statistical model
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Semi-Automated Seal Detection on the Western Antarctic Peninsula: An Unsupervised Machine Learning Approach for Detecting Ice Seals in Aerial Survey Data
Claire McGinnity, Connor C. G. Bamford, … Peter T. Fretwell·Remote Sensing in Ecology and ConservationPeer-reviewed·Mar 6, 2026
- Abundance and distribution of ice-associated seals in the western Bering Sea and Sea of Okhotsk, 2012-2013
Paul B. Conn, Irina S. Trukhanova, … Alexandr Vasiliev·bioRxiv·Sep 7, 2026
- Accuracy and precision of citizen scientist animal counts from drone imagery
S. Wood, P. Robinson, … R. S. Beltran·bioRxiv·Dec 3, 2020
- Wildlife and Marine Mammal Spatial Observatory: Observation and automated detection of Southern Right Whales in multispectral satellite imagery
Ludwig Houégnigan, Enrique Romero Merino, … Climent Nadeu·bioRxiv·Jan 20, 2022
- Abundance and distribution of ringed and bearded seals in the Chukchi Sea: a reference for future trends
Peter L. Boveng, Vladimir I. Chernook, … Amy L. Willoughby·Arctic SciencePeer-reviewed·Jan 1, 2025
- Modeling vital rates and age-sex structure of Pacific arctic phocids: influence on aerial survey correction factors
P. B. Conn, I. S. Trukhanova·bioRxiv·Apr 12, 2022