Sign in
NeurosciencePsyCh Journal
Peer-reviewed journal article

150 years of research on Vierordt’s law - Fechner’s fault?

Stefan GlasaueriD, Zhuanghua ShiiD

Abstract

150 years ago, the physiologist Karl Vierordt discovered one type of systematic errors in time perception - an overestimation of long durations and underestimation of short durations, now known as Vierordt's law. Here we review the original study in its historical context and ask whether Vierordt's law is a result of an unnatural experimental randomization protocol. Using iterative Bayesian updating, we simulated the original results with astonishing accuracy. To validate whether the experimental protocol matters, we compared duration reproduction from two sequences with the same sampled distribution and found that trial-wise variation determines the reproduction error. We conclude that Vierordt's law is caused by an unnatural yet widely used experimental protocol.

02 /Specification & Classification

Click any tag to browse matching papers
Citations
66
FWCI
5.51
Field percentile
top 3%

Reproducibility ledger

Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.

Sign in to file a reproducibility report.

Similarity Map
SelectedSame fieldCross-field
THISWang '21Chen '23Sierra '21Keane '19Makin '20Naim '21
61% semantic matchNeuroscience
Tianhe Wang, Yingrui Luo, Ernst Pöppel+1 more·bioRxiv·May 31, 2021· 4 citations