A time-lagged association between the gut microbiome, nestling weight and nestling survival in wild great tits
G. L. Davidson, S. E. Somers, N. Wiley, C. N. Johnson, M. S. Reichert, R. P. Ross, C. Stanton, J. L. Quinn
Abstract
O_LINatal body mass is a key predictor of viability and fitness in many animals. While variation in body mass and therefore juvenile viability may be explained by genetic and environmental factors, emerging evidence points to the gut microbiota as an important factor influencing host health. The gut microbiota is known to change during development, but it remains unclear whether the microbiome predicts fitness, and if it does, at which developmental stage it affects fitness traits. C_LIO_LIWe collected data on two traits associated with fitness in wild nestling great tits (Parus major): weight and survival to fledging. We characterised the gut microbiome using 16S rRNA sequencing from nestling faeces and investigated temporal associations between the gut microbiome and fitness traits across development at day 8 (D8) and day 15 (D15) post-hatching. We also explored whether particular microbial taxa were indicator species that reflected whether nestlings survived or not. C_LIO_LIThere was no link between mass and microbial diversity on D8 or D15. However, we detected a time-lagged relationship where weight at D15 was negatively associated with the microbial diversity at D8, controlling for weight at D8, therefore reflecting relative weight gain over the intervening period. C_LIO_LIIndicator species analysis revealed that specificity values were high and fidelity values were low, suggesting that indicator taxa were primarily detected within either the survived or not survived groups, but not always detected in birds that either survived or died. Therefore these indicator taxa may be sufficient, but not necessary for determining either survival or mortality, perhaps owing to functional overlap in microbiota. C_LIO_LIWe highlight that measuring microbiome-fitness relationships at just one time point may be misleading, especially early in life. Instead, microbial-host fitness effects may be best investigated longitudinally to detect critical development windows for key microbiota and host traits associated with neonatal weight. Our findings should inform future hypothesis testing to pinpoint which features of the gut microbial community impact on host fitness, and when during development this occurs. Such confirmatory research will shed light on population level processes and could have the potential to support conservation. C_LI
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Organism
- Assay
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- No evidence for associations between brood size, gut microbiome diversity and survival in great tit (Parus major) nestlings
M. Liukkonen, M. Hukkanen, … S. Ruuskanen·bioRxiv·Sep 6, 2022
- Individual variation in the avian gut microbiota: the influence of host state and environmental heterogeneity
S. E. Somers, G. L. Davidson, … J. L. Quinn·bioRxiv·Sep 5, 2022
- Gut microbiome disturbances of altricial Blue and Great tit nestlings are countered by continuous microbial inoculations from parental microbiomes
D. Diez-Mendez, K. H. Bodawatta, … K. Sam·bioRxiv·Feb 20, 2022
- The influence of diet on gut microbiome and body mass dynamics in a capital-breeding migratory bird
Isabelle L Jones, Kirsty J. Marsh, … Xavier A. Harrison·PeerJPeer-reviewed·Dec 18, 2023
- Not-so-great tit: early-life environment drives long-term decrease in adult body mass in a wild bird population
David López‐Idiáquez, Ella F. Cole, … Ben C. Sheldon·bioRxiv·Feb 17, 2026
- Seasonal and environmental factors contribute to the variation in the gut microbiome: a large-scale study of a small bird
M. Liukkonen, J. Muriel, … S. Ruuskanen·bioRxiv·Dec 12, 2023