henhaobio
Sign in

Ecological IndicatorsEcologyPeer-reviewed journal article

Advancing ecological assessment: The integration of eDNA metabarcoding into an estuarine fish index

Mukesh P. BhendarkariD, Oriol CanalsiD, Carlos Jurado, Iñaki Mendibil, A. UriarteiD, Ángel BorjaiD, Naiara Rodríguez‐EzpeletaiD

PDFDOIPreprint

Abstract

In the face of increasing anthropogenic pressures on estuarine ecosystems, methods to efficiently and reliably assess their ecological status are essential. This study explores the integration of environmental DNA analysis into the AZTIs Fish Index (AFI) to assess ecological status of estuarine ecosystems. Surface water eDNA sampling and bottom trawl surveys were performed across multiple estuaries in the Basque Country, Spain, and resulting species data were used to calculate AFI scores. eDNA metabarcoding consistently detected higher fish species richness than bottom trawling, while the latter remained more effective at capturing demersal species. In general, ecological classifications from eDNA- and bottom trawl derived data displayed low concordance, largely due to differing species assemblages and metric contributions. These results emphasize the respective strengths and weaknesses of each methodology and the necessity for method-specific calibration. Considering that the AFI is calibrated using bottom trawl data, its direct application to eDNA-derived species lists may lead to some inconsistencies. This study underscores the critical necessity to establish eDNA-specific reference conditions and to recalibrate index thresholds accordingly. While eDNA approach may not entirely replace traditional methods, its scalability, sensitivity, and minimal ecological disturbances establish it as an essential complementary application within estuarine assessment programs. This research strongly supports the urgent advancement of eDNA-based indices and the critical enhancement of reference conditions for their effective incorporation into ecological assessment frameworks under the Water Framework Directive.

Citations
1
FWCI
0.53
Field percentile
top 34%

Reproducibility ledger

Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.

Sign in to file a reproducibility report.

Similarity Map
SelectedSame fieldCross-field
THISAhn '20Jackman '24Haderlé '26Curtis '26Curto '25Sander '25
76% semantic matchEcology
H. Ahn, M. Kume, Y. Terashima+5 more·bioRxiv·Mar 22, 2020