Genetics in MedicineGeneticsPeer-reviewed journal article
Specification of frequency criteria for secondary findings genes to improve variant classification concordance
Jennifer J. JohnstoniD, Kristy LeeiD, Deborah RitteriD, Steven M. HarrisoniD, Leslie G. BieseckeriD
Abstract
PurposeThe return of secondary findings (SF) is well-established in clinical testing and is increasingly employed in clinical research testing. Variant classification can be challenging due to the lack of monogenic disease entity (MDE, defined as a gene-phenotype pair) specific variant classification recommendations. A key criterion for variant classification is disease allele frequency thresholds (DAFTs), which are not established for all MDEs recommended for the return of SF. MethodsWe calculated DAFTs for SF MDEs considering prevalence, gene contribution, and penetrance. ACMG criterion BS1 was set at the calculated DAFT value, with BA1 set at ten times the calculated DAFT. For genes associated with multiple SF MDEs without clear genotype-phenotype correlation, DAFT values were combined. GnomAD Grpmax filtering allele frequencies (FAF) for pathogenic/likely pathogenic classified variants were compared to calculated thresholds. ResultsWe determined BS1 and BA1 values for 58 SF MDEs (47 genes). No pathogenic/likely pathogenic variant Grpmax FAF was greater than the relevant MDE-specific BA1. ConclusionSetting BA1 and BS1 thresholds should improve variant classification consistency and reduce misclassifications. For SF MDEs without current ClinGen Variant Curation Expert Panel (VCEP) specifications, these frequency specifications can be used until full criteria are available.
- Citations
- 0
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Field percentile
- 14th percentile
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Empirically calibrated allele frequency thresholds for ACMG BA1, BS1 and PM2 evidence criteria
V.K. Dubey, Christopher Edward Eisenhart·medRxiv·Sep 9, 2026
- Response to Shah et al: Using high-resolution variant frequencies empowers clinical genome interpretation and enables investigation of genetic architecture
Nicola Whiffin, Angharad M. Roberts, … James S. Ware·The American Journal of Human GeneticsPeer-reviewed·Jan 1, 2019
- VarSight: Prioritizing Clinically Reported Variants with Binary Classification Algorithms
Undiagnosed Diseases Network, James Holt, … Elizabeth A. Worthey·BMC BioinformaticsPeer-reviewed·Oct 15, 2019
- Automating ACMG Variant Classifications With BIAS-2015 v2.0.0: Algorithm Analysis and Benchmark Against the FDA-Approved eRepo Dataset
Christopher Edward Eisenhart, Rachel Brickey, … Vafa Bayat·medRxiv·Feb 23, 2025
- Defining and Reducing Variant Classification Disparities
Moez Dawood, Shawn Fayer, … Irene Gallego Romero·Genome MedicinePeer-reviewed·Dec 3, 2024
- Evidence-based recommendations for gene-specific ACMG/AMP variant classification from the ClinGen ENIGMA BRCA1 and BRCA2 Variant Curation Expert Panel
Michael T. Parsons, Miguel de la Hoya, … Amanda B. Spurdle·The American Journal of Human GeneticsPeer-reviewed·Aug 13, 2024