Navigating Memorability Landscapes: Hyperbolic Geometry Reveals Hierarchical Structures in Object Concept Memory
Fiona M. LeeiD, Marc G. BermaniD, Andrew J. StieriD, Wilma Alice BainbridgeiD
Abstract
Why are some object concepts (e.g., birds, cars, vegetables, etc.) more memorable than others? Prior studies have suggested that features (e.g., color, animacy, etc.) and typicality (e.g., robin vs. penguin) of object images influences the likelihood of being remembered. However, a complete understanding of object memorability remains elusive. In this study, we examine whether the geometric relationship between object concepts explains differences in their memorability. Specifically, we hypothesize that image concepts will be geometrically arranged in hierarchical structures and that memorability will be explained by a concepts depth in these hierarchical trees. To test this hypothesis, we construct a Hyperbolic representation space of object concepts (N=1,854) from the THINGS database (Hebart et al., 2019), which consists of naturalistic images of concrete objects, and a space of 49 feature dimensions derived from data-driven models. Using ALBATROSS (Stier, A. J., Giusti, C., & Berman, M. G., In prep), a stochastic topological data analysis technique that detects underlying structures of data, we demonstrate that Hyperbolic geometry efficiently captures the hierarchical organization of object concepts above and beyond a traditional Euclidean geometry and that hierarchical organization is related to memorability. We find that concepts closer to the center of the representational space are more prototypical and also more memorable. Importantly, Hyperbolic distances are more predictive of memorability and prototypicality than Euclidean distances, suggesting that concept memorability and typicality are organized hierarchically. Taken together, our work presents a novel hierarchical representational structure of object concepts that explains memorability and typicality.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 4
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- The Features Underlying the Memorability of Objects
Max A. Kramer, Martin N. Hebart, … Wilma Alice Bainbridge·Science AdvancesPeer-reviewed·Apr 26, 2023
- Topological structure in human spatial representation revealed through drawing
Mahwish Kittur, Agnes Zhang, … Sami R. Yousif·bioRxiv·Oct 8, 2026
- Scene memorability reflects representational distinctiveness within visual categories
Charlotte Atzert, Filip Děchtěrenko, … Niko A. Busch·bioRxiv·Mar 23, 2026
- Semantic Dimensions Support the Cortical Representation of Object Memorability
Matthew A. Slayton, Cortney M. Howard, … Simon W. Davis·Journal of Cognitive NeurosciencePeer-reviewed·Jan 1, 2025
- Representational magnitude as a geometric signature ofimage and word memorability
David A. Vogelsang, Micha Heilbron·Journal of Memory and LanguagePeer-reviewed·Jul 15, 2026
- The geometry of low- and high-level perceptual spaces
Suniyya Amna Waraich, Jonathan D. Victor·Journal of NeurosciencePeer-reviewed·Dec 7, 2023