Dissociating refreshing and elaboration and their impacts on memory
Lea Maria BartschiD, Vanessa Maria LoaizaiD, Lutz JänckeiD, Klaus OberaueriD, Jarrod A. Lewis‐PeacockiD
Abstract
Maintenance of information in working memory (WM) is assumed to rely on refreshing and elaboration, but clear mechanistic descriptions of these cognitive processes are lacking, and it is unclear whether they are simply two labels for the same process. This fMRI study investigated the extent to which refreshing, elaboration, and repeating of items in WM are distinct neural processes with dissociable behavioral outcomes in WM and long-term memory (LTM). Multivariate pattern analyses of fMRI data revealed differentiable neural signatures for these processes, which we also replicated in an independent sample of older adults. In some cases, the degree of neural separation within an individual predicted their memory performance. Elaboration improved LTM, but not WM, and this benefit increased as its neural signature became more distinct from repetition. Refreshing had no impact on LTM, but did improve WM, although the neural discrimination of this process was not predictive of the degree of improvement. These results demonstrate that refreshing and elaboration are separate processes that differently contribute to memory performance.\n\nHighlightsO_LIRepeated reading, refreshing, and elaboration are differentiable in brain activation patterns in both young and older adults.\nC_LIO_LIElaboration selectively improved long-term memory for young adults, and the size of the benefit was related to the neural separability of elaboration from other processes.\nC_LIO_LIOlder adults implemented a sub-optimal form of elaboration, and this may be a factor contributing to age-related deficits in long-term memory.\nC_LI\n\nEthics statementThe study was approved by the ethical review board of the canton of Zurich (BASEC-No. 2017-00190) and all subjects gave informed written consent in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki.\n\nData and code availability statementAll behavioral data and analysis scripts can be assessed on the Open Science Framework (osf.io/p2h8b/). The fMRI data that support the findings of this study are available on request from the corresponding author, LMB. The fMRI data are not publicly available due to restrictions of the Swiss Ethics Committees on research involving humans regarding data containing information that could compromise the privacy of research participants.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 41
- FWCI
- 2.47
- Field percentile
- top 11%
- Organism
- Assay
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Mental Operations on Long-term Memory do not Require a Sustained Increase in Working Memory Engagement
I. Efsane Algın, Eren Günseli·bioRxiv·Aug 21, 2026
- Refresh my memory: Episodic memory reinstatements intrude on working memory maintenance
A. N. Hoskin, A. M. Bornstein, … J. D. Cohen·bioRxiv·May 30, 2018
- Working memory processing boosts the neural representation of long-term memories
Melinda Sabo, Laura‐Isabelle Klatt, Daniel A. Schneider·Communications PsychologyPeer-reviewed·Aug 26, 2025
- Rapid Neural Reorganization during Retrieval Practice Predicts Subsequent Long-term Retention and False Memory
Liping Zhuang, Jingyi Wang, … Shaozheng Qin·Nature Human BehaviourPeer-reviewed·Oct 7, 2021
- Temporal expectation triggers competition in working memory that leads to forgetting
Ziyi Duan, Ziyao Zhang, Jarrod A. Lewis‐Peacock·bioRxiv·Mar 28, 2026
- Focusing attention in human working memory and long-term memory: benefits through dissociable processes
Dongyu Gong, Dejan Draschkow, Anna Christina Nobre·Nature CommunicationsPeer-reviewed·May 3, 2025