Human Group Size Puzzle: Why It Is Odd That We Live in Large Societies
Abstract
Human groups tend to be much larger than those of non-human primates. This is a puzzle. When ecological factors do not limit primate group size, the problem of coordination creates an upper threshold even when cooperation is guaranteed. This paper offers a simple model of group coordination towards behavioural synchrony to spell out the mechanics of group size limits, and thus show why it is odd that humans live in large societies. The findings suggest that many of our species evolved social behaviours and culturally-maintained social technologies emerged as a solution to this problem.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Organism
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Unique allometry of group size and collective brain mass in humans and primates relative to other mammals
M. J. Hamilton, R. S. Walker·bioRxiv·Nov 4, 2019
- Changes in group size during resource shifts reveal drivers of sociality across the tree of life
A. B. Kao, A. K. Hund, … H. F. McCreery·bioRxiv·Mar 17, 2020
- Social costs of group life: Larger groups have less affiliative behavior and more social conflict
Brian A Lerch, J. K. Warutere, … S. C. Alberts·bioRxiv·Nov 11, 2026
- The Cooperation Ladder: Scale-dependent payoffs and population dynamics create surges, stalls and reversals
E. Schnell, R. Schimmelpfennig, M. Muthukrishna·bioRxiv·Feb 19, 2021
- Conflict-Mediated Group Size Regulation: A Theory of Supraoptimal and Suboptimal Group Size
Eric Schniter·bioRxiv·Aug 24, 2026
- Structural and Cognitive Solutions to Prevent Group Fragmentation in Group-Living Species
R. Dunbar·bioRxiv·Dec 13, 2022