Genomic approaches to build de novo elite breeding gene pools from locally-adapted landraces
Safiètou T. Fall, Alexander Wireko KenaiD, Brian R. RiceiD, Ghislain KanfanyiD, Cyril DiattaiD, Ndjido Ardo KaneiD, Allan K. FritziD, Geoffrey P. MorrisiD
Abstract
Many nascent breeding programs aim to achieve genetic gain by crossing locally elite germplasm, but a lack of systematic approaches to develop elite gene pools from locally-adapted varieties hinders their progress. Motivated by the observation of undesirable transgressive segregation in presumed elite crosses in Senegalese cereal breeding programs, we designed approaches for de novo development of elite gene pools from locally-adapted landrace-derived germplasm. We first define two types of "elite" germplasm: cis-elite, phenotypically similar and genetically homogeneous for locally-adapted traits ("acquired traits"); versus trans-elite, phenotypically similar, but genetically heterogeneous for acquired traits. Next, we defined two genomic approaches for de novo inference of elite gene pools: population-based genotypic inference (PGI) and QTL-based genotypic inference (QGI), and compared to a family-based phenotypic inference (FPI) approach. Using simulations that trace the evolution from locally-adapted landraces to elite breeding lines, we evaluate the effectiveness of these strategies in nascent forward breeding programs. QGI accurately and cost-effectively identifies both cis- and trans-elite pairs, regardless of the underlying trait architecture, while PGI is less sensitive when trait architecture is oligogenic. Over ten cycles of phenotypic recurrent selection, programs based on cis-elite crosses consistently outperformed those based on trans-elite crosses for genetic gain. The findings highlight the value of trait genetic architecture knowledge for elite gene pool development and provide a practical roadmap for elite germplasm development in modernizing breeding programs.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 4
- FWCI
- 11.87
- Field percentile
- top 2%
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Origin Specific Genomic Selection: a simple process to optimize the favourable contribution of parents to progeny
Chin Jian Yang, Rajiv K. Sharma, … Ian Mackay·G3 Genes Genomes GeneticsPeer-reviewed·May 19, 2020
- Comparison of genomic-enabled cross selection criteria for the improvement of inbred line breeding populations
Alice Danguy des Déserts, Nicolas Durand, … Sophie Bouchet·G3 Genes Genomes GeneticsPeer-reviewed·Aug 24, 2023
- Optimized breeding strategies to harness Genetic Resources with different performance levels
Antoine Allier, Simon Teyssèdre, … Alain Charcosset·BMC GenomicsPeer-reviewed·May 11, 2020
- Genomic selection strategies for clonally propagated crops
Christian R. Werner, R. Chris Gaynor, … John M. Hickey·Theoretical and Applied GeneticsPeer-reviewed·Mar 23, 2023
- Effects of Different Strategies for Exploiting Genomic Selection in Perennial Ryegrass Breeding Programs
Hadi Esfandyari, Dario Fè, … Just Jensen·G3 Genes Genomes GeneticsPeer-reviewed·Aug 20, 2020
- Genomic prediction models based on a large-scale recombinant population allow rapid breeding of desired genotypes
Toshiyuki Sakai, Hiroki Takagi, … Akira Abe·bioRxiv·Sep 14, 2025