Sign in
Animal Behavior & CognitionProceedings of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences
Peer-reviewed journal article

Dynamic strategic social learning in nest-building zebra finches and its generalisability

Alexis J BreeniD, Tristan EckersleyiD, Andrés Camacho‐AlpízariD, Connor T. LambertiD, Gopika BalasubramanianiD, Susan D. HealyiD, Richard L. McElreathiD, Lauren M. GuilletteiD

Abstract

Animals often balance asocial and social information strategically, adjusting when and from whom they copy based on context. Yet the cognition driving this dynamic--and its broader implications--remains poorly understood. We tested whether zebra finches use a copy-if-dissatisfied strategy by manipulating the quality of their initial nest-building or reproductive experience, showing them a conspecific nest-builder, and tracking subsequent material choices. Builder-males were more likely to choose the demon-strated social material--particularly at first choice--if they had previously used low-quality material. Using cognitive modelling, we estimated how latent learning mechanisms shaped decisions, identifying two asocial and two social parameters. These estimates provide the first formal evidence for the cognitive basis of nest building. Forward simulations informed--but not predetermined--by these parameters approximated observed behaviour, supporting their causal role. We then used these parameters in exploratory simulations to test how choices might shift under novel payoff contexts. We found that payoff structure--not (dis)satisfaction--was the primary driver of social material use, though higher rewards did not proportionally increase copying. These exploratory simulation results offer preliminary insight into mechanisms underlying material-use variation. Our study illustrates how computational modelling can robustly link behaviour to underlying learning mechanisms and probe the generalisability of animal cognition--a rarity in this field.

PDFDOI

02 /Specification & Classification

Click any tag to browse matching papers
Citations
0
FWCI
0.00
Field percentile
47th percentile

Reproducibility ledger

Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.

Sign in to file a reproducibility report.