bioRxivEcologyPreprint
Social License Pressure and Public Support for the Lethal Control of Dingoes in Australia.
Abstract
The lethal control of dingoes to protect livestock has been publicly funded since Australia was colonised. Although lethal dingo control had social license to operate (i.e., public support) from colonial settlers, there have been limited examinations into contemporary Australian opinions. This study explored predictive factors for Australian public support for lethal dingo control. It was hypothesised that higher social license pressure (perceptions of low procedural fairness, trust, and confidence in the governments dingo management policies), positive attitudes toward Australian wildlife, and dog ownership would predict less support for lethal dingo control. Additionally, attitude towards Australian wildlife was predicted to mediate the relationship between social license pressure and support for lethal dingo control. Australian adults (N = 990, aged 18 - 83, 52% women) voluntarily completed an online survey, which included the Attitudes to Australian Wildlife scale and novel items. Results supported all hypotheses (p < .001). More Australians opposed lethal dingo control than supported it. Social license pressure, attitude towards Australian wildlife, and dog ownership significantly predicted support for lethal dingo control as hypothesised. Attitude towards Australian wildlife mediated the relationship between social license pressure and support for lethal dingo control with a large effect size (f2 = 1.73). This study provides evidence of tenuous community support for the lethal control of dingoes. Given that a loss of social license would challenge Australias longstanding livestock practices, our findings are particularly useful for the proactive development of dingo management policies that the Australian public will support. HighlightsO_LISupport for lethal dingo control was polarised, but more Australians were opposed C_LIO_LIUnfavourable public perception of dingo policies; increasing social license pressure C_LIO_LIDog owners demonstrated less support for lethal dingo control than non-dog owners C_LIO_LIWildlife attitudes mediated social license and support for dingo control relationship C_LIO_LISocial license to operate for lethal dingo control is tenuous in Australia C_LI
- research focus: host-pathogen & immune response
- research focus: benchmarking
- research focus: database / resource
- approach: statistical model
- Citations
- 0
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Public attitudes towards free-roaming dogs and dog ownership practices in Bulgaria, Italy, and Ukraine
L. M. Smith, R. Quinnell, … L. Collins·bioRxiv·May 17, 2021
- Graphical factorial surveys reveal the acceptability of wildlife observation at protected areas.
J. Cerri, S. Bertolino, E. Martinelli·Journal for Nature ConservationPeer-reviewed·Aug 1, 2019
- Texans support mountain lion conservation management
O. Ohrens, B. Ghasemi, … L. M. Elbroch·bioRxiv·Aug 16, 2023
- Communicating information about the psychology of a wild carnivore, the red fox, influences perceived attitudinal changes but not overall tolerance in people
F. B. Morton, D. C. Henri, … C. Hopkins·bioRxiv·Nov 10, 2023
- Beliefs about a widely popularised human-wildlife conflict are largely unreflective of local experiences and ecological data in wild red foxes, Vulpes vulpes
Kristy A. Adaway, Charlotte Rachael Hopkins, … Frederick Blake Morton·bioRxiv·Dec 10, 2025
- The role and origins of human attitudes in Human-Wildlife Conflict responses: Insights from Spectacled Bears (Tremarctos ornatus) and other wild carnivores in Southern Ecuador
F Lopes, Mateo Peñaherrera‐Aguirre, Rodrigo Cisneros·bioRxiv·Mar 30, 2026