The effects of training population design on genomic prediction accuracy in wheat
Stefan McKinnon EdwardsiD, Jaap B. Buntjer, Robert J. JacksoniD, Alison R. BentleyiD, Jacob Lage, Ed Byrne, Chris Burt, PETER L. JACK, Simon T. BerryiD, Edward Flatman, Bruno Poupard, Stephen P SmithiD, Charlotte HayesiD, R. Chris GaynoriD, Gregor GorjanciD, Phil HowelliD, Eric S. OberiD, Ian MackayiD, John M. HickeyiD
Abstract
Genomic selection offers several routes for increasing genetic gain or efficiency of plant breeding programs. In various species of livestock there is empirical evidence of increased rates of genetic gain from the use of genomic selection to target different aspects of the breeders equation. Accurate predictions of genomic breeding value are central to this and the design of training sets is in turn central to achieving sufficient levels of accuracy. In summary, small numbers of close relatives and very large numbers of distant relatives are expected to enable accurate predictions.\n\nTo quantify the effect of some of the properties of training sets on the accuracy of genomic selection in crops we performed an extensive field-based winter wheat trial. In summary, this trial involved the construction of 44 F2:4 bi- and triparental populations, from which 2992 lines were grown on four field locations and yield was measured. For each line, genotype data were generated for 25,000 segregating single nucleotide polymorphism markers. The overall heritability of yield was estimated to 0.65, and estimates within individual families ranged between 0.10 and 0.85. Within cross genomic prediction accuracies of yield BLUEs were 0.125 - 0.127 using two different cross-validation approaches, and generally increased with training set size. Using related crosses in training and validation sets generally resulted in higher prediction accuracies than using unrelated crosses. The results of this study emphasize the importance of the training set design in relation to the genetic material to which the resulting prediction model is to be applied.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 109
- FWCI
- 8.26
- Field percentile
- top 2%
- Assay
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Genomic prediction for malting quality traits in practical barley breeding programs
Pernille Merete Sarup, Vahid Edriss, … Just Jensen·bioRxiv·Jul 30, 2020
- Breeding Program Optimization for Genomic Selection in Winter Wheat
Megan Calvert, Byron Evers, … Jesse Poland·bioRxiv·Oct 7, 2020
- Across-population genomic prediction in grapevine opens up promising prospects for breeding
Charlotte Brault, Vincent Segura, … Agnès Doligez·Horticulture ResearchPeer-reviewed·Jan 1, 2022
- Multi-trait ensemble genomic prediction and simulations of recurrent selection highlight importance of complex trait genetic architecture in long-term genetic gains in wheat
Nick S. Fradgley, Keith A. Gardner, … James Cockram·in silico PlantsPeer-reviewed·Jan 1, 2023
- Phenotyping replication is a major determinant of genomic predictive ability in sweet sorghum (Sorghum bicolor Moench)
Jean Rigaud Charles, Brian R. Rice, … Gaël Pressoir·bioRxiv·Jul 22, 2026
- Combining genetic resources and elite material populations to improve the accuracy of genomic prediction in apple
Xabi Cazenave, Bernard Petit, … Hélène Muranty·G3 Genes Genomes GeneticsPeer-reviewed·Dec 10, 2021