henhaobio
Sign in

Basic and Applied EcologyEcologyPeer-reviewed journal article

Moisture limits the diversity of nesting bees, wasps, and parasitoids in lying and standing deadwood

Massimo MartiniiD, Matteo DaddaiD, Felix FornoffiD, Heike FeldhaariD, Arong LuoiD, Finn RehlingiD, Joshua Emil SpitziD, Michael StaabiD, Simon ThorniD, Chao‐Dong ZhuiD, Alexandra‐Maria KleiniD

PDFDOIPreprint

Abstract

Saproxylic insect community assembly is structured by deadwood and forest habitat gradients, as well as biotic interactions such as competition, predation, and parasitism. However, co-variation between abiotic and biotic conditions limits our ability to disentangle their contributions. Furthermore, a focus on beetles in temperate and boreal forests has left important taxonomic and geographic knowledge gaps. Here, we tested how experimentally manipulated tree diversity, deadwood position (lying vs. standing), and biotic interactions with a dominant antagonist (ant exclusion) structure communities of deadwood-cavity-nesting bees, wasps, and their parasitoids in a subtropical forest. Lying deadwood supported less diverse and abundant communities than standing deadwood while retaining approximately twice as much moisture. Moreover, host emergence declined along moisture gradients within each deadwood type. Together, these patterns identify substrate moisture as an important factor limiting bee and wasp communities nesting in deadwood - reflecting reduced brood production, survival, or both - and as a candidate driver for their positive association with standing deadwood in forests. By contrast, neither ant exclusion nor observed ant occurrence was associated with host or parasitoid responses. Because standing deadwood is typically scarce in managed forests, our findings support retaining or creating standing deadwood structures alongside lying deadwood and, more broadly, promoting dry and elevated nesting substrates for cavity-nesting bees and wasps in conservation and restoration measures.

Citations
0
FWCI
0.00
Field percentile
top 21%

Reproducibility ledger

Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.

Sign in to file a reproducibility report.