medRxivGenetic & Genomic MedicinePreprint
RNA-sequencing improves diagnosis for neurodevelopmental disorders by identifying pathogenic non-coding variants and reinterpretation of coding variants
Jordy DekkeriD, Rachel SchotiD, Michiel BongaertsiD, Walter G. de Valk, Monique M. van Veghel–Plandsoen, Kathryn Monfils, Hannie DoubeniD, Peter ElfferichiD, Esmee KasteleijniD, Leontine van UneniD, Geert GeeveniD, Jasper J. SarisiD, Yvette van IerlandiD, Frans W. Verheijen, Marianne L. T. van der Sterre, Farah Sadeghi-Niaraki, Hidde H. HuidekoperiD, Monique WilliamsiD, Martina WilkeiD, Virginie J. M. VerhoeveniD, Marieke JoosteniD, Anneke J.A. KievitiD, Ingrid M.B.H. van de LaariD, Lies H. HoefslootiD, Marianne Hoogeveen‐Westerveld, , Tjakko J. van HamiD
Abstract
BackgroundFor neurodevelopmental disorders (NDD), a molecular diagnosis is key for predicting outcome, treatment and genetic counseling. Currently, in about half of NDD cases, routine DNA-based testing fails to establish a genetic diagnosis. Transcriptome analysis (RNA-seq) improves the diagnostic yield for some groups of diseases, but has not been applied to NDD in a routine diagnostic setting. MethodsHere, we explored the diagnostic potential of RNA-seq in a cohort of 96 individuals including 67 undiagnosed NDD subjects. We created a user-friendly web-application to analyze RNA-seq data from single individuals cultured skin fibroblasts for genic, exonic and intronic expression outliers, based on modified OUTRIDER Z-scores. Candidate pathogenic events were complemented/matched with genomic data and, if required, confirmed with additional functional assays. ResultsWe identified pathogenic small genomic deletions, mono-allelic expression, aberrant splicing events, deep intronic variants resulting in pseudo-exon insertion, but also synonymous and nonsynonymous variants with deleterious effects on transcription. This approach increased the diagnostic yield for NDD by 12%. Diagnostic pitfalls during transcriptome analysis include detection of splice abnormalities in putative disease genes caused by benign polymorphisms and/or absence of expression of the responsible gene in the tissue of choice. This was misleading in one case and could have led to the wrong diagnosis in the absence of appropriate phenotyping. ConclusionsNonetheless, our results demonstrate the utility of RNA-seq in molecular diagnostics and stress the importance of multidisciplinary team consultation. In particular, the approach is useful for the identification and interpretation of unexpected pathogenic changes in mRNA processing and expression in NDD.
- organism: human
- assay: bulk RNA-seq
- research focus: differential expression
- approach: statistical model
- Citations
- 3
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Identification of rare-disease genes in diverse undiagnosed cases using whole blood transcriptome sequencing and large control cohorts
Laure Frésard, Craig Smail, … Stephen B. Montgomery·bioRxiv·Sep 4, 2018
- RNA-sequencing first approach generates new diagnostic candidates in Mendelian disorders
Carolina Jaramillo Oquendo, Htoo A. Wai, … Diana Baralle·medRxiv·Jul 5, 2023
- Stratified evaluation of blood RNA sequencing in a rare disease cohort
Tarik Duzenli, Saliha Durmuş, … Mehmet Ali Ergün·medRxiv·May 29, 2026
- Characterization of snRNA-related neurodevelopmental disorders through the Spanish Undiagnosed Rare Disease Programs
Marta Sevilla Porras, Esther Nieto-Molina, … Mireia del Toro·medRxiv·Sep 16, 2025
- Clinical implementation of RNA sequencing for Mendelian disease diagnostics
Vicente A. Yépez, Mirjana Gušić, … Holger Prokisch·Genome MedicinePeer-reviewed·Apr 4, 2022
- Benchmarking RNA-seq Tools for Real-World Diagnostic Applications
Sarah Silverstein, Kaushik Ram Ganapathy, … Carsten G. Bönnemann·medRxiv·Jan 28, 2026