PLoS ONESystems BiologyPeer-reviewed journal article
GOcats: A tool for categorizing Gene Ontology into subgraphs of user-defined concepts
Abstract
Gene Ontology is used extensively in scientific knowledgebases and repositories to organize the wealth of available biological information. However, interpreting annotations derived from differential gene lists is difficult without manually sorting into higher-order categories. To address these issues, we present GOcats, a novel tool that organizes the Gene Ontology (GO) into subgraphs representing user-defined concepts, while ensuring that all appropriate relations are congruent with respect to scoping semantics. We tested GOcats performance using subcellular location categories to mine annotations from GO-utilizing knowledgebases and evaluating their accuracy against immunohistochemistry datasets in the Human Protein Atlas (HPA).\n\nIn comparison to mappings generated from UniProts controlled vocabulary and from GO slims via OWLTools Map2Slim, GOcats outperforms these methods without reliance on a human-curated set of GO terms. By identifying and properly defining relations with respect to semantic scope, GOcats can use traditionally problematic relations without encountering erroneous term mapping. We applied GOcats in the comparison of HPA-sourced knowledgebase annotations to experimentally-derived annotations provided by HPA directly. During the comparison, GOcats improved correspondence between the annotation sources by adjusting semantic granularity. Utilized in this way, GOcats can perform an accurate knowledgebase-level evaluation of curated HPA-based annotations.
- organism: human
- assay: proteomics
- research focus: benchmarking
- research focus: gene regulatory network inference
- research focus: cell type annotation
- approach: statistical model
- Citations
- 15
- FWCI
- 0.57
- Field percentile
- top 41%
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Advances in Gene Ontology Utilization Improve Statistical Power of Annotation Enrichment
Eugene W. Hinderer, Robert M Flight, … Hunter Moseley·PLoS ONEPeer-reviewed·Aug 15, 2019
- Word and sentence embedding tools to measure semantic similarity of Gene Ontology terms by their definitions
Dat Duong, Wasi Uddin Ahmad, … Jingyi Jessica Li·Journal of Computational BiologyPeer-reviewed·Nov 1, 2018
- Summary visualisations of Gene Ontology terms with GO-Figure!
Maarten J. M. F. Reijnders, Robert Michael Waterhouse·Frontiers in BioinformaticsPeer-reviewed·Apr 1, 2021
- Use of OWL within the Gene Ontology
Christopher J Mungall, Heiko Dietze, David Osumi-Sutherland·bioRxiv·Oct 7, 2014
- Evaluating Representations for Gene Ontology Terms
Dat Duong, Ankith Uppunda, … Kai-Wei Chang·bioRxiv·Jan 31, 2020
- Automatic Consistency Assurance for Literature-based Gene Ontology Annotation
Jiyu Chen, Nicholas Lewis Geard, … Karin M. Verspoor·BMC BioinformaticsPeer-reviewed·Nov 25, 2021