Non-invasive prenatal testing by low coverage genomic sequencing: Detection limits of screened chromosomal microdeletions
Marcel KucharíkiD, Andrej Gnip, Michaela HýblováiD, Jaroslav BudišiD, Lucia Striešková, Mária Haršányová, Ondrej PösiD, Zuzana Kubiritova, Ján RadvánszkyiD, Gabriel MinárikiD, Tomáš SzemesiD
Abstract
ObjectiveTo study the detection limits of chromosomal microaberrations in non-invasive prenatal testing with aim for five target microdeletion syndromes, including DiGeorge, Prader-Willi/Angelman, 1p36, Cri-Du-Chat, and Wolf-Hirschhorn syndromes.\n\nMethodWe used known cases of pathogenic deletions from ISCA database to specifically define regions critical for the target syndromes. Our approach to detect microdeletions, from whole genome sequencing data, is based on sample normalization and read counting for individual bins. We performed both an in-silico study using artificially created data sets and a laboratory test on mixed DNA samples, with known microdeletions, to assess the sensitivity of prediction for varying fetal fractions, deletion lengths, and sequencing read counts.\n\nResultsThe in-silico study showed sensitivity of 79.3% for 10% fetal fraction with 20M read count, which further increased to 98.4% if we searched only for deletions longer than 3Mb. The test on laboratory-prepared mixed samples was in agreement with in-silico results, while we were able to correctly detect 24 out of 29 control samples.\n\nConclusionOur results suggest that it is possible to incorporate microaberration detection into basic NIPT as part of the offered screening/diagnostics procedure, however, accuracy and reliability depends on several specific factors.\n\nWhats already known about this topic?Microdeletion detection accuracy, similarly to most common trisomies detection, was found to be dependent mostly on technical and biological parameters of the test and tested samples, such as coverage of target region, fetal fraction, size and positions of the deletions.\n\nWhat does this study add?Estimation of relevant regions for five chosen microdeletion syndromes. Confirmation and improvement upon previous methods. Systematic evaluation of sensitivity of microdeletion detection with read counts from 10M to 20M.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 41
- FWCI
- 5.52
- Field percentile
- top 3%
- Organism
- Assay
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Clinical Validation of a Non-Invasive Prenatal Test for Genome-Wide Detection of Fetal Copy Number Variants
Roy B Lefkowitz, John A Tynan, … Mathias Ehrich·bioRxiv·Dec 4, 2015
- Breaking the 7 Mb barrier: Clinical cohort validation of genome-wide NIPT with fetal fraction enrichment and BinDel for detection of 1 Mb microdeletions and -duplications
Karmen Vaiküll, Priit Paluoja, … Kaarel Krjutškov·medRxiv·Feb 11, 2026
- Noninvasive Detection of Fetal Genetic Variations through Polymorphic Sites Sequencing of Maternal Plasma DNA
Song Tian Gao·The Journal of Gene MedicinePeer-reviewed·Nov 30, 2021
- Noninvasive Prenatal Screening at Low Fetal Fraction: Comparing Whole- Genome Sequencing and Single-Nucleotide Polymorphism Methods
Carlo G. Artieri, Carrie E. Haverty, … Dale Muzzey·Prenatal DiagnosisPeer-reviewed·Mar 20, 2017
- Computational framework for targeted high-coverage sequencing based NIPT
Hindrek Teder, Priit Paluoja, … Priit Palta·PLoS ONEPeer-reviewed·Jul 8, 2019
- Systematic evaluation of NIPT aneuploidy detection software tools with clinically validated NIPT samples
Priit Paluoja, Hindrek Teder, … Priit Palta·PLoS Computational BiologyPeer-reviewed·Dec 20, 2021