Molecular Ecology ResourcesEcologyPeer-reviewed journal article
A long-term ecological research data set from the marine genetic monitoring programme ARMS-MBON 2018-2020
Nauras DaraghmehiD, Katrina M. ExteriD, Justine PagnieriD, Piotr BałazyiD, Ibon CancioiD, Georgios ChatzigeorgiouiD, Eva ChatzinikolaouiD, Maciej ChełchowskiiD, Nathan Alexis Mitchell ChrismasiD, Thierry ComtetiD, Thanos DailianisiD, Klaas DeneudtiD, Oihane Díaz de CerioiD, Markos DigenisiD, Vasilis GerovasileiouiD, José GonzáleziD, L. KauppiiD, Jon Bent KristofferseniD, Piotr KuklińskiiD, Rafał LasotaiD, Liraz Levy, Magdalena MałachowicziD, Borut MavričiD, Jonas MortelmansiD, Estefanía ParedesiD, , Matthias ObstiD
Abstract
Molecular methods such as DNA/eDNA metabarcoding have emerged as useful tools to document biodiversity of complex communities over large spatio-temporal scales. We established an international Marine Biodiversity Observation Network (ARMS-MBON) combining standardised sampling using autonomous reef monitoring structures (ARMS) with metabarcoding for genetic monitoring of marine hard-bottom benthic communities. Here, we present the data of our first sampling campaign comprising 56 ARMS units deployed in 2018-2019 and retrieved in 2018-2020 across 15 observatories along the coasts of Europe and adjacent regions. We describe the open-access data set (image, genetic, and metadata) and explore the genetic data to show its potential for marine biodiversity monitoring and ecological research. Our analysis shows that ARMS recovered more than 60 eukaryotic phyla capturing diversity of up to [~]5,500 amplicon sequence variants and [~]1,800 operational taxonomic units, and up to [~]250 and [~]50 species per observatory using the cytochrome c oxidase subunit I (COI) and 18S rRNA marker genes, respectively. Further, ARMS detected threatened, vulnerable and non-indigenous species often targeted in biological monitoring. We show that while deployment duration does not drive diversity estimates, sampling effort and sequencing depth across observatories do. We recommend that ARMS should be deployed for at least three to six months during the main growth season to use resources as efficiently as possible and that post-sequencing curation is applied to enable statistical comparison of spatio-temporal entities. We suggest that ARMS should be used in biological monitoring programmes and long-term ecological research and encourage the adoption of our ARMS-MBON protocols.
- Citations
- 9
- FWCI
- 4.23
- Field percentile
- top 5%
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Separating faces in ARMS metabarcoding improves marine biodiversity monitoring: a comparison across protocols, experimental designs, and photographic surveys
Anne Chenuil, Elyna Bouchereau, … Vincent Dubut·Molecular Ecology ResourcesPeer-reviewed·Sep 11, 2026
- MinION-in-ARMS: Nanopore Sequencing To Expedite Barcoding Of Specimen-Rich Macrofaunal Samples From Autonomous Reef Monitoring Structures
J. J. M. Chang, Y. C. A. Ip, … D. Huang·bioRxiv·Mar 30, 2020
- Towards the reliable use of aerial eDNA for ecosystem monitoring
Nadia Sokal, J. R. Úrbez‐Torres, Letitia M. Da Ros·bioRxiv·May 21, 2026
- Spatial and seasonal biodiversity variation in a large Mediterranean lagoon using environmental DNA metabarcoding through sponge tissue collection
Andrea Corral‐Lou, Ana Ramón‐Laca, … Ana Riesgo·Environmental DNAPeer-reviewed·May 1, 2025
- Quantitative assessment of multiple fish species around artificial reefs using environmental DNA metabarcoding
- Are marine biodiversity hotspots still blackspots for barcoding?
F. Mugnai, E. Meglecz, … F. Costantini·bioRxiv·Jul 12, 2021