bioRxivEvolutionary BiologyPreprint
Compositionally constrained sites drive long branch attraction
Abstract
AO_SCPLOWBSTRACTC_SCPLOWAccurate phylogenies are fundamental to our understanding of the pattern and process of evolution. Yet, phylogenies at deep evolutionary timescales, with correspondingly long branches, have been fraught with controversy resulting from conflicting estimates from models with varying complexity and goodness of fit. Analyses of historical as well as current empirical datasets, such as alignments including Microsporidia, Nematoda or Platyhelminthes, have demonstrated that inadequate modeling of across-site compositional heterogeneity, which is the result of biochemical constraints that lead to varying patterns of accepted amino acids along sequences, can lead to erroneous topologies that are strongly supported. Unfortunately, models that adequately account for across-site compositional heterogeneity remain computationally challenging or intractable for an increasing fraction of contemporary datasets. Here, we introduce "compositional constraint analysis", a method to investigate the effect of site-specific constraints on amino acid composition on phylogenetic inference. We show that more constrained sites with lower diversity and less constrained sites with higher diversity exhibit ostensibly conflicting signal under models ignoring across-site compositional heterogeneity that lead to long branch attraction artifacts and demonstrate that more complex models accounting for across-site compositional heterogeneity can ameliorate this bias. We present CAT-PMSF, a pipeline for diagnosing and resolving phylogenetic bias resulting from inadequate modeling of across-site compositional heterogeneity based on the CAT model. CAT-PMSF is robust against long branch attraction in all alignments we have examined. We suggest using CAT-PMSF when convergence of the CAT model cannot be assured. We find evidence that compositionally constrained sites are driving long branch attraction in two metazoan datasets and recover evidence for Porifera as the sister group to all other animals.
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Why do phylogenomic analyses of early animal evolution continue to disagree? Sites in different structural environments yield different answers
Akanksha Pandey, Edward L. Braun·bioRxiv·Aug 26, 2018
- MAST: Phylogenetic Inference with Mixtures Across Sites and Trees
Thomas K. F. Wong, Caitlin Cherryh, … Robert Lanfear·Systematic BiologyPeer-reviewed·Feb 29, 2024
- Modeling site-and-branch-heterogeneity with GFmix
Charley G. P. McCarthy, Edward Susko, … Andrew J. Roger·Systematic BiologyPeer-reviewed·May 27, 2026
- Scalable empirical mixture models that account for across-site compositional heterogeneity
Dominik Schrempf, Nicolas Lartillot, Gergely J. Szöllősi·Molecular Biology and EvolutionPeer-reviewed·Jun 13, 2020
- Phylogenetic modelling of compositional and exchange rate changes over time
Peter Gordon Foster·bioRxiv·Mar 14, 2025
- Is Over-parameterization a Problem for Profile Mixture Models?
H. Banos, E. Susko, A. J. Roger·bioRxiv·Feb 18, 2022