Landscape restoration strategies differ in their predicted benefits for species persistence

Abstract

Global biodiversity recovery demands restoration at landscape scales, where ecological outcomes are shaped not only by habitat amount but also spatial arrangement. Alternative landscape restoration strategies can increase habitat amount, improve quality, and alter configuration in fundamentally different ways and may therefore vary in their efficiency. Here, we conceptualise five landscape restoration strategies and use a spatially explicit metapopulation framework to compare their ability to increase predicted species persistence across heterogeneous landscapes and trait space defined by dispersal ability and specialisation. We find that restoration outcomes are strongly trait-dependent, with restoration of existing degraded habitats yielding the highest benefits - particularly for specialists. Improvement of the landscape matrix to create low-quality habitat primarily benefits generalists, while strategies creating new habitat patches or enlarging patches provide more consistent but modest gains. These results reveal fundamental trade-offs among restoration strategies and highlight the utility of trait-explicit approaches to inform their implementation and evaluation.