bioRxivGenomicsPreprint
Berkson's Paradox: A Common Statistical Error in Genomics Analyses
Abstract
Berkson's paradox describes a scenario where a spurious correlation arises between two independent variables within a subset of samples selected based on a third variable which the first two variables cause. The conditions for Berkson's paradox are perfect in genomics due to many variables we study being causally intertwined, common selection criteria being biased either intentionally or not by the variables of interest, and our propensity to look towards correlations for windows into underlying mechanism. Here, we provide examples of cases where spurious correlations are likely to arise in common genomics analyses, and suggest analysis approaches to avoid misinterpreting spurious correlations.
- Citations
- 0
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Beware the Jaccard: the choice of metric is important and non-trivial in genomic colocalisation analysis.
Stefania Salvatore, Knut Dagestad Rand, … Geir Kjetil Sandve·Briefings in BioinformaticsPeer-reviewed·Jun 18, 2019
- Adjusting For Principal Components Of Molecular Phenotypes Induces Replicating False Positives
Andy W. Dahl, Vincent Guillemot, … Noah Zaitlen·GeneticsPeer-reviewed·Jan 28, 2019
- Explanation implies causation?
Leslie Myint, Jeffrey T. Leek, Leah R. Jager·bioRxiv·Nov 13, 2017
- Spatial autocorrelation: bane or bonus?
Matt. D. M. Pawley, Brian H. McArdle·bioRxiv·Aug 6, 2018
- Correcting statistical bias in correlation-based kinship estimators
Wei Jiang, Xiangyu Zhang, … Hongyu Zhao·bioRxiv·Jan 13, 2021
- Beyond Bonferroni Revisited: Concerns over inflated false positives in conservation genetics, genetics, and neuroscience
Tonya J.H. White, Jan van der Ende, Thomas E. Nichols·bioRxiv·Sep 8, 2018