Beware the Jaccard: the choice of metric is important and non-trivial in genomic colocalisation analysis.
Stefania SalvatoreiD, Knut Dagestad RandiD, Ivar GrytteniD, Egil FerkingstadiD, Diana DomańskaiD, Lars HoldeniD, Marius GheorgheiD, Anthony MathelieriD, Ingrid K. GladiD, Geir Kjetil SandveiD
Abstract
BackgroundThe generation and systematic collection of genome-wide data is ever-increasing. This vast amount of data has enabled researchers to study relations between a variety of genomic and epigenomic features, including genetic variation, gene regulation, and phenotypic traits. Such relations are typically investigated by comparatively assessing genomic co-occurrence. Technically, this corresponds to assessing the similarity of pairs of genome-wide binary vectors. A variety of metrics have been proposed for this problem in other fields like ecology. However, while several of these metrics have been employed for assessing genomic co-occurrence, their appropriateness for the genomic setting has never been investigated.\n\nResultsWe show that the choice of metric may strongly influence results and propose two alternative modelling assumptions that can be used to guide this choice. On both simulated and real genomic data, the Jaccard index is strongly affected by dataset size and should be used with caution. The Forbes coefficient (fold change) and tetrachoric correlation are less affected by dataset size, but one should be aware of increased variance for small datasets.\n\nAvailabilityAll results on simulated and real data can be inspected and reproduced at: https://hyperbrowser.uio.no/sim-measure
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 28
- FWCI
- 0.83
- Field percentile
- top 30%
- Assay
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- gene-cocite: a web application for extracting, visualising and assessing the cocitations of a list of genes
Richard Newton, Lorenz Wernisch·bioRxiv·Feb 17, 2017
- Variable information across SNPs in GWAS data can cause false rejections of colocalisation which can be resolved by proportional colocalisation tests
Chris Wallace, Chloe Robins, Toby Johnson·bioRxiv·Sep 8, 2025
- Revisiting Colocalization from the Perspective of Similarity
Luciano da Fontoura Costa·bioRxiv·May 23, 2022
- Berkson's Paradox: A Common Statistical Error in Genomics Analyses
JJ Hum, Keegan D. Korthauer, Carl G. de Boer·bioRxiv·Oct 26, 2026
- Estimating colocalization probability from limited summary statistics
Emily A. King, Fengjiao Dunbar, … Jacob F. Degner·BMC BioinformaticsPeer-reviewed·May 17, 2021
- The Multi-scale Copula Index (MCI): a new information-theoretic measure of association and its applications in functional cancer genomics
Timothy Pham, Karina Meneses-Cime, … Pablo Tamayo·bioRxiv·Oct 16, 2026