PLoS BiologyNeurosciencePeer-reviewed journal article
Visual attention is not always spatially coupled to subsequent oculomotor program
- Citations
- 53
- FWCI
- 4.31
- Field percentile
- top 5%
Abstract
The premotor theory of attention postulates that spatial attention arises from the activation of saccade areas and that the deployment of attention is the consequence of motor programming. Yet, attentional and oculomotor processes have been shown to be dissociable at the neuronal level in covert attention tasks. To investigate a potential dissociation at the behavioral level, we instructed human participants to saccade towards one of two nearby, competing saccade cues. The spatial distribution of visual attention was determined using oriented Gabor stimuli presented either at the cue locations, between them or at several other equidistant locations. Results demonstrate that accurate saccades towards one of the cues were associated with presaccadic enhancement of visual sensitivity at the respective saccade endpoint compared to the non-saccaded cue location. In contrast, averaging saccades, landing between the two cues, were not associated with attentional facilitation at the saccade endpoint, ruling out an obligatory coupling of attentional deployment to the oculomotor program. Rather, attention before averaging saccades was equally distributed to the two cued locations. Taken together, our results reveal a spatial dissociation of visual attention and saccade programming. They suggest that the oculomotor program depends on the state of attentional selection before saccade onset, and that saccade averaging arises from unresolved attentional selection.
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Different computations underlie overt and covert spatial attention
Hsin-Hung Li, Jasmine Pan, Marisa Carrasco·Nature Human BehaviourPeer-reviewed·Apr 19, 2021
- Pre-saccadic remapping relies on dynamics of spatial attention
Martin Szinte, Donatas Jonikaitis, … Heiner Deubel·eLifePeer-reviewed·Dec 31, 2018
- Coupling of saccade plans to endogenous attention during urgent choices
Allison T Goldstein, Terrence R. Stanford, Emilio Salinas·bioRxiv·Mar 1, 2024
- Microsaccades track shifting but not necessarily maintaining covert visual-spatial attention
Anna M van Harmelen, Freek van Ede·bioRxiv·Jul 14, 2025
- Neural representations of covert attention across saccades: comparing pattern similarity to shifting and holding attention during fixation
Xiaoli Zhang, Julie D. Golomb·eNeuroPeer-reviewed·Feb 8, 2021
- Attention and microsaccades: do attention shifts trigger new microsaccades or only bias ongoing microsaccades?
Baiwei Liu, Zampeta-Sofia Alexopoulou, Freek van Ede·Communications PsychologyPeer-reviewed·Oct 22, 2024