Physics in Medicine and BiologyNeurosciencePeer-reviewed journal article
Detection of Transient Neurotransmitter Response Using Personalized Neural Networks
Ivan S. KlyuzhiniD, Connor W. J. BevingtoniD, Ju-Chieh Kevin ChengiD, Vesna SossiiD
Abstract
AO_SCPLOWBSTRACTC_SCPLOWMeasurement of stimulus-induced dopamine release and other types of transient neurotransmitter response (TNR) from dynamic PET images typically suffers from limited detection sensitivity and high false positive rates. Measurement of TNR of a voxel-level can be particularly problematic due to high image noise. In this work, we perform voxel-level TNR detection using artificial neural networks (ANN) and compare their performance to previously used standard statistical tests. Different ANN architectures were trained and tested using simulated and real human PET imaging data, obtained with the tracer [11C]raclopride (a D2 receptor antagonist). A distinguishing feature of our approach is the use of "personalized" ANNs that are designed to operate on the image from a specific subject and scan. Training of personalized ANNs was performed using simulated images that have been matched with the acquired image in terms of the signal and noise. In our tests of TNR detection performance, the F-test of the linear parametric neurotransmitter PET (lp-ntPET) model fit residuals was used as the reference method. For a moderate TNR magnitude, the areas under the receiver operating characteristic curves in simulated tests were 0.64 for the F-test and 0.77-0.79 for the best ANNs. At a fixed false positive rate of 0.01, the true positive rates were 0.6 for the F-test and 0.8-0.9 for the ANNs. When applied to a real image, the ANNs identified a TNR cluster missed by the F-test. The newly found cluster was verified to contain TNR by direct lp-ntPET model fitting. These results demonstrate that personalized ANNs may offer a greater detection sensitivity of dopamine release and other types of TNR compared to previously used methods.
- organism: human
- assay: imaging
- research focus: differential expression
- approach: statistical model
- approach: machine learning (classical)
- Citations
- 6
- FWCI
- 0.49
- Field percentile
- top 36%
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- A fluorescent nanosensor paint reveals the heterogeneity of dopamine release from neurons at individual release sites
Sofia Elizarova, Abed Alrahman Chouaib, … James A. Daniel·Proceedings of the National Academy of SciencesPeer-reviewed·May 25, 2022
- Random burst sensing of neurotransmitters
P. Read Montague, Terry M. Lohrenz, … Kenneth T. Kishida·bioRxiv·Apr 13, 2019
- Pharmacological enhancement of dopamine neurotransmission does not affect illusory pattern perception
Elke Stefanie Smith, Simon Michalski, … Jan Peters·eNeuroPeer-reviewed·Jul 1, 2024
- Test-Retest Reliability of Dopaminergic fPET and fMRI Measures During Reward Processing
Gabriel Schlosser, Patricia Anna Handschuh, … M B Reed·NeuroImagePeer-reviewed·Jun 9, 2026
- Quantifying the Brain Predictivity of Artificial Neural Networks with Nonlinear Response Mapping
Aditi Anand, Sanchari Sen, Kaushik Roy·Frontiers in Computational NeurosciencePeer-reviewed·Aug 24, 2021
- Low amplitude burst detection of catecholamines
Amnah Eltahir, Jason P. White, … P. Read Montague·bioRxiv·Aug 2, 2021