bioRxivEcologyPreprint
Body size is a better predictor of intra- than interspecific variation of animal stoichiometry across realms
M. P. Nessel, O. Dezerald, J. Merder, K. Andraczek, U. Brose, M. Filipiak, M. Jackson, M. Jochum, S. Harpole, H. Hillebrand, S. J. Leroux, R. Onstein, R. Paseka, G. Perry, A. Rugenski, J. Sitters, E. Sperfeld, M. Striebel, E. Zandona, H. Doi, N. Eisenhauer, V. F. Farjalla, N. J. Gotelli, J. Hood, P. Kratina, , A. L. Gonzalez
Abstract
Animal stoichiometry affects fundamental processes ranging from organismal physiology to global element cycles. However, it is unknown whether animal stoichiometry follows predictable scaling relationships with body mass and whether adaptation to life on land or water constrains patterns of elemental allocation. To test both interspecific and intraspecific body-size scaling relationships of the nitrogen (N), phosphorus (P), and N:P content of animals, we used a subset of the StoichLife database encompassing 9,933 individual animals (vertebrates and invertebrates) belonging to 1,543 species spanning 10 orders of magnitude of body size from terrestrial, freshwater, and marine realms. Across species, body mass did not explain much variation in %N and %P composition, although the %P of invertebrates decreased with size. The effects of body size on species elemental content were small in comparison to the effects of taxonomy. Body size was a better predictor of intraspecific than interspecific elemental patterns. Between 42 to 45% in intraspecific stoichiometric variation was explained by body size for 27% of vertebrate species and 35% of invertebrate species. Further, differences between organisms inhabiting aquatic and terrestrial realms were observed only in invertebrate interspecific %N, suggesting that the realm does not play an important role in determining elemental allocation of animals. Based on our analysis of the most comprehensive animal stoichiometry database, we conclude that (i) both body size and realm are relatively weak predictors of animal stoichiometry across taxa, and (ii) body size is a good predictor of intraspecific variation in animal elemental content, which is consistent with tissue-scaling relationships that hold broadly across large groups of animals. This research reveals a lack of general scaling patterns in the elemental content across animals and instead points to a large variation in scaling relationships within and among lineages.
- organism: multiple species
- assay: metagenomics
- research focus: ecology & biodiversity
- approach: statistical model
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Body stoichiometry of heterotrophs: assessing drivers of interspecific variations in elemental composition.
B. Andrieux, J. Signor, … F. Jabot·bioRxiv·Apr 8, 2020
- Phylogeny, ecology, and allometry: hierarchical controls of insect elemental composition
Léo Laborieux, Richard J. Knecht, … Anshuman Swain·bioRxiv·Dec 14, 2025
- Effects of water nutrient concentrations on stream macroinvertebrate community stoichiometry: a large-scale study
Miriam Beck, Elise Billoir, … Michael Danger·bioRxiv·Feb 1, 2024
- Patterns and potential drivers of intraspecific variability in the body elemental composition of a terrestrial consumer, the snowshoe hare (Lepus americanus)
M. Rizzuto, S. J. Leroux, … J. Balluffi-Fry·bioRxiv·Mar 30, 2019
- Intraspecific variation and environmental filtering jointly and dynamically shaped individual elementomes of two sympatric small mammals
José R. Montiel-Mora, Vladislav Chrastný, … Thibaut Rota·bioRxiv·Sep 28, 2026
- Elemental content of a host-parasite relationship in the threespine stickleback
M. Braat, R. L. Grunberg, D. I. Bolnick·bioRxiv·May 4, 2022