Acta Scientiarum AgronomyGeneticsPeer-reviewed journal article
Subset selection of markers for genome-enabled prediction of genetic val-ues using radial basis function neural networks
Isabela de Castro Sant’Anna, Gabi Nunes SilvaiD, Moysés NascimentoiD, Cosme Damião CruziD
Abstract
This paper aimed to evaluate the efficiency of subset selection of markers for genome-enabled prediction of genetic values using radial basis function neural networks (RBFNN). For this purpose, an F1 population from hybridization of divergent parents with 500 individuals genotyped with 1,000 SNP-type markers was simulated. Phenotypic traits were determined by adopting three different gene action models - additive, additive-dominant, and epistasic, complying with two dominance situations: partial and complete with quantitative traits admitting heritability (h2) equal to 30 and 60%, each one controlled by 50 loci, considering two alleles per locus, totaling 12 different scenarios. To evaluate the predictive ability of RR_BLUP and the neural networks, a cross-validation procedure with five replicates were trained using 80% of the individuals of the population. Two methods were used: dimensionality reduction and stepwise regression. The square of the correlation between the predicted genomic estimated breeding value (GEBV) and the phenotype value was used to measure predictive reliability. For h2 = 0.3 in the additive scenario, the R2 values were 59% for neural network (RBFNN) and 57% for RR-BLUP, and in the epistatic scenario, R2 values were 50% and 41%, respectively. Additionally, when analyzing the mean-squared error root, the difference in performance between the techniques is even greater. For the additive scenario, the estimates were 91 for RR-BLUP and 5 for neural networks and, in the most critical scenario, they were 427 for RR-BLUP and 20 for neural network. The results showed that the use of neural networks and variable selection techniques allows capturing epistasis interactions, leading to an improvement in the accuracy of prediction of the genetic value and, mainly, to a large reduction of the mean square error, which indicates greater genomic value.
- assay: whole-genome sequencing
- research focus: variant effect prediction
- research focus: genome assembly
- research focus: benchmarking
- approach: machine learning (classical)
- Citations
- 15
- FWCI
- 1.61
- Field percentile
- top 17%
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Predicting genotypic values associated with gene interactions using neural networks: A simulation study for investigating factors affecting prediction accuracy
Akio Onogi·bioRxiv·Dec 18, 2019
- Uncertainty Quantification in Variable Selection for Genetic Fine-Mapping using Bayesian Neural Networks
Wei Cheng, Sohini Ramachandran, Lorin A. Crawford·iSciencePeer-reviewed·Jun 7, 2022
- Benchmarking algorithms for genomic prediction of complex traits
Christina Brady Del Azodi, Andrew L. McCarren, … Shin‐Han Shiu·bioRxiv·Apr 20, 2019
- Effect of selection on bias and accuracy in genomic prediction of breeding values
Gopal Ramdasji Gowane, Sang Lee, … Julius H. J. van der Werf·bioRxiv·Apr 9, 2018
- GPFN: Prior-Data Fitted Networks for Genomic Prediction
Jordan R. Ubbens, Ian Stavness, Andrew G. Sharpe·IEEE Transactions on Computational Biology and BioinformaticsPeer-reviewed·Aug 7, 2025
- Accounting for epistasis improves genomic prediction of phenotypes with univariate and bivariate models across environments
Elaheh Vojgani, Torsten Pook, … Henner Simianer·Theoretical and Applied GeneticsPeer-reviewed·Jun 11, 2021