BMC Evolutionary BiologyBioinformaticsPeer-reviewed journal article
bModelTest: Bayesian phylogenetic site model averaging and model comparison
Abstract
BackgroundReconstructing phylogenies through Bayesian methods has many benefits, which include providing a mathematically sound framework, providing realistic estimates of uncertainty and being able to incorporate different sources of information based on formal principles. Bayesian phylogenetic analyses are popular for interpreting nucleotide sequence data, however for such studies one needs to specify a site model and associated substitution model. Often, the parameters of the site model is of no interest and an ad-hoc or additional likelihood based analysis is used to select a single site model.\n\nResultsbModelTest allows for a Bayesian approach to inferring and marginalizing site models in a phylogenetic analysis. It is based on trans-dimensional Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) proposals that allow switching between substitution models as well as estimating the posterior probability for gamma-distributed rate heterogeneity a proportion of invariable sites and unequal base frequencies. The model can be used with the full set of time-reversible models on nucleotides, but we also introduce and demonstrate the use of two subsets of time-reversible substitution models.\n\nConclusionWith the new method the site model can be inferred (and marginalized) during the MCMC analysis and does not need to be pre-determined, as is now often the case in practice, by likelihood-based methods. The method is implemented in the bModelTest package of the popular BEAST 2 software, which is open source, licensed under the GNU Lesser General Public License and allows joint site model and tree inference under a wide range of models.
- Citations
- 914
- FWCI
- 27.35
- Field percentile
- top 1%
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Bayesian inference of phylogeny is robust to substitution model over-parameterization
L. Fabreti, S. Höhna·bioRxiv·Feb 17, 2022
- Complex models of sequence evolution require accurate estimators as exemplified with the invariable site plus Gamma model
L. T. Nguyen, A. von Haeseler, B. Q. Minh·bioRxiv·Nov 24, 2017
- Mixture Models for Dating with Confidence
Gustavo Darlim, Sebastian Höhna·bioRxiv·Sep 25, 2024
- Diversification models conflate likelihood and prior, and cannot be compared using conventional model-comparison tools
M. R. May, C. Rothfels·bioRxiv·Jul 12, 2021
- Bayesian Selection of Relaxed-clock Models:Distinguishing Between Independent and Autocorrelated Rates
Muthukumaran Panchaksaram, Lucas A. Freitas, Mario dos Reis·Systematic BiologyPeer-reviewed·Nov 18, 2024
- Identifying the best approximating model in Bayesian phylogenetics: Bayes factors, cross-validation or wAIC?
Nicolas Lartillot·Systematic BiologyPeer-reviewed·Feb 18, 2023